ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007675 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Ms Scheutzow Page 6 September 21, 1990 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of this study, there appears to be two areas of environmental concern associated with the subject property The first concern is the potential existence of underground storage tanks on the property Architectural plans from 1930 and 1967 show 15 USTs on the facility An additional 1,000-gallon tank is shown, but the plans do not specify whether the tank is an above ground tank or a UST These USTs are shown as being used for the storage of gasoline, waste oil, fuel oil, and lubricant oil, and range in capacity from 65 gallons to 7,200 gallons The 1967 plans indicate that four of the USTs were filled and abandoned in September, 1967 The status of the remaining 12 tanks is unknown There were no other evidence of USTs, such as vent pipes and fill plates, on the property Mr Willrich stated that he had no additional information regarding the tanks The second concern is the many areas of moderate to heavily oil-stained concrete in the facility, and the the oil that appears to be leaking from the waste oil storage tanks In most areas, the integrity of the concrete could not be determined due to the amount of oil present on the concrete TRC recommends that facility personnel practice good housekeeping procedures to minimize the potential for problems to occur In addition,TRC recommends that upon vacating the facility, Firestone clean the concrete throughout the facility and inspect the floor to insure that the concrete is in good condition and has not been breached by oil No visually obvious environmental concerns were observed during the site walkover, other than the oil stains and potential USTs previously mentioned There were no transformers observed on the property One bulk material sample of floor tile was collected in the bathroom of the sales area for asbestos analysis Laboratory analysis did not indicate detectable levels of asbestos in this sample The floor the appeared to be in good, non-friable condition No other suspect asbestos containing material, such as structural fireproofing, ceiling tiles, sprayed-on ceiling material and pipe insulation was observed on the property No visually obvious environmental concerns were observed in the aerial photographs Aerial photographs of the subject property indicated that the property building has been in existence since at least 1936 A review of regulatory agency information did not indicate any environmental concerns associated with the subject property or immediately adjacent properties The subject property was not listed on any of the in-house regulatory agency information • 7TC