Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Harlin Knoll <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division <br /> 20 February 2001 <br /> ON <br /> Page 3 <br /> In December 1998, QST drilled soil borings BFS-1 and BFS-2 to collect sail and <br /> groundwater samples in the vicinity of the three closed-in-place USTs A report d <br /> 19 February 1999 of this field activity and analytical testingresults t aced <br /> SJCEHD Figure 2 in this report Shows the boring locations Four soil omitted to the <br /> analyzed at sample depths from 13 5 and 20 5 feet below grade in BFS-1 and 1 were <br /> 18 5 feet below grade from BFS-2 The sample results were non-detect ford 15 5 to <br /> toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), MTBE, other ox benzene, <br /> Field photoionization detector (PID) readings also showed negligible,tless thanalcohols <br /> Of volatiles from soil samples Groundwater was encountered in these bor4 ppmvt <br /> approximately 28 feet below grade A grab groundwater sample collected from iborin t <br /> BFS-1 contained TPHg at 4,200 µg/l and BTEX at 220 µg/I, 400 µ 1, 340 g <br /> 1,500 pg/l, respectively MTBE was also detected in groundwater from burin g l' and <br /> concentration of 0 at a <br /> 78 µg/l Of the gasoline-related compounds listed above, lonly <br /> xylenes were detected in a groundwater sample collected fromy <br /> boring BFS-2 (0 55 µg/!) <br /> These results would indicate that soil impacts from TPHg identified in the 199 <br /> FE is limited to the immediate area of FE's 1997 slant borings 7 work by <br /> In January 2000, Orion installed three groundwater monitoring wells (MVV-1 <br /> and MW-3) in the vicinity of the former USTs A report detailing the well i and 2, <br /> and groundwater sampling was submitted to the SICEHD on 7 July 2000 nralJ well <br /> d from locations are shown on Figure 2 One soil sample was selected and analyzed he well <br /> r boring during drilling activities The soil sample from MW-1, at a depth of 2 feet below <br /> m each <br /> grade, contained the only detectable concentration of MTBE at 99 micrograms <br /> kilogram (µ g/kg) This is several orders of magnitude below the EP per <br /> Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRG) of 37,00Q A Region 9 <br /> November <br /> MTBE in industrial soils The soil samples analyzed from rMW 2evised and MW-3 2000, for <br /> were below detection limits at depths of 35 and 15 feet below grade, respectively MTBE <br /> and BTEX were not detected in any of the other soil samples analyzed from the TPHg <br /> borings <br /> In January and May 2000, groundwater samples from well MW-1 <br /> (inst <br /> former source area) did not contain detectable amounts of TPHg orBTEXd near the <br /> amount of MTBE was detected in MW-1 at a concentration of 7 9 A small <br /> round of sampling and 4 D µg!l during the second round U psamplingientµg/1 during the first <br /> contained TPHg concentrations of 91 µg/l during the first round Of land 42 <br /> µg/l from the second round MTBE was not detected in MW-2 in either round of <br /> sampling The samples from cross-gradient well MVV-3 did not contain detectable <br /> concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, and MTBE during all rounds of groundwater sampling <br /> S\BFS\STOCKT0N\LTR\LTR007 DOC 2/20/01 <br />