My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007682
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
400
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544653
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007682
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2019 7:47:09 PM
Creation date
7/11/2019 2:46:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007682
RECORD_ID
PR0544653
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004695
FACILITY_NAME
BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE #3573
STREET_NUMBER
400
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95201
APN
13907009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
400 N EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr Knoll <br /> February 19, 1999 <br /> Page 4 <br /> site during drithng consisted of dark brown clay from the surface to approximately 20 to 25 feet bgs A silty <br /> sand was encountered from approximately 25 to 30 feet bgs in Boring EFS-1 and 20 to 22 feet bgs in Boring <br /> BFS-2 The soil types observed are described on the boring logs which are attached in Appendix B <br /> Groundwater was encountered during drilling activities at 25 feet bgs in BFS-I and 20 feet bgs in BFS-2 <br /> TPH and BTEX were not detected above method reporting limits in the soil samples submitted from depths <br />' of 13 5 and 20 feet bgs in BFS-I and 15 5 and 18 5 feet bgs in BFS-2 Analytical results for the soil and <br /> groundwater samples are summarized in Table 2 The laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documents are <br /> found in Attachment C <br />' Groundwater analysis reported TPH as gasoline in BFS-I at 4,200 nucrograms per Inter (ug/L) BTEX was <br /> also detected in the groundwater samples from BFS-I Three oxygenates MTBE, DIPE, and Ethanol were <br />' also detected at concentrations of 0 78, 6 1 and 6 4 ug/L in water from BFS-1 <br /> BFS-2 had total:xylene at a concentration of 0 55 ug/L as the only gasoline constituent reported above Method <br /> Detection Limits Analytical results of groundwater are summarized in Table 2 <br />' CLOSURE ANALYSIS <br />' Based on additional local research, the groundwater quality in the vicinity of the site is poor due to overdraft <br /> of the groundwater basin There are two inactive water supply wells within a 1 mile radius of the site <br /> However, these supply wells have been inactive for the last 20 years due to the poor quality of groundwater <br /> The three gasoline tanks (Tank Nos 1 through 3) under investigation were cleaned and filled with sand in <br /> 1967 Therefore, no further release to soil in the vadose zone or additional impact to groundwater is possible <br /> Based on the previous investigation conducted by Foothill Engineering in 1997, impacted soil was present <br /> beneath Tanks 2 and 3 at a depth of approximately 25 feet The impacted soil is hunted to the area beneath <br /> these tanks verified by slant Borings P113 and PB4 which are down gradient and towards the north Foothill <br /> Engineering concluded that the impacted soil was aged gasoline <br />' In December 1998, QST drilled two borings BFS-1 and BFS-2 Boring BFS-1 was drilled approximately 7 <br /> feet to the east of Tank 2 and Boring BFS-2 was drilled approximately 13 feet to the south of Tank 3 <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in soil samples analyzed from Borings BFS-1 and BFS-2 indicating <br /> that impacted soil is residual and limited to the area beneath the tanks Soil samples from this investigation <br /> were also analyzed for MTBE and other oxygenates and these constituents were not detected in the soil <br /> samples Thus confirming Foothill's conclusion that the impacted soil detected is likely from an aged release <br /> of gasoline <br /> Analytical results from groundwater samples collected during the QST investigation showed the presence of <br /> TPH, BTEX and oxygenates in groundwater sample BFS-1 TPH, BTEX and MTBE were not detected in <br /> the groundwater sample collected from Boring BFS-2 Therefore, the data indicates that the impact to <br /> groundwater is limited However, MTBE was not detected in the soil samples like the other petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons so the source of the MTBE is questionable Given the absence of a known MTBE source onsite <br /> and the presence of MTBE in groundwater, the cause of the petroleum hydrocarbon impact to groundwater <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.