Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> • 15 November 1995 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0142 <br /> Page 10 of 19 <br /> I6 2 1 EXCAVATION <br /> I Z 1 <br /> All of the mentioned methods of ex-situ treatment require excavation of the impacted soil, which is <br />' generally the fastest and most effective method for soil remediation Impacted soil in the vadose and <br /> smear zones extend to a depth in excess of 45 feet Therefore, soil would have to excavated to <br />' depths greater than 45 feet below surface grade(bsg) Once excavated, the impacted soil is generally <br /> stockpiled on site for treatment or transportation for disposal If, soil is treated on-site and <br /> hydrocarbon concentrations can be reduced to non-detectable (ND) levels, the soil can be used to <br />' backfill the excavation, if soil is disposed off-site, backfill must be imported for the excavation <br />' 6 2 2 FEASIBILITY OF EXCAVATION <br /> Excavation of impacted soil, followed by ex-situ treatment and/or disposal is a very effective method <br /> I of remediation, non-detect (ND) can usually be achieved by excavation since, theoretically, all <br /> contaminated soil is removed However, excavation is usually too costly if the volume of impacted <br /> soil is too great or if the impacted soil is present at depths requiring special equipment or extensive <br /> shoring Both special excavation equipment and shonng would be required at the Stockton Plating <br /> site <br /> I Excavation at the Stockton Plating site is not feasible considering the depth of impacted soil, space <br /> limitations, current site usage and cost for disposal and backfill <br /> 6 2 3 ESTIMATED COSTS FOR EXCAVATION <br /> IAt the subject site, impacted soil could not be excavated with standard excavating equipment If <br /> disruption of site operations and space limitations force off-site disposal, the cost for excavation of <br /> impacted soil could exceed $200 per cubic yard Based upon the removal of at least 2,000 cubic <br /> yards of hydrocarbon-impacted soil, the costs would exceed $400,000 <br /> 6 3 IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION <br /> I Acceptance of this treatment technology by the regulatory community has grown in recent years, due <br /> to success achieved at sites in California and elsewhere <br /> I6 3 1 PRINCIPLES <br /> For this remediation method, hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria are propagated in a liquid medium, <br /> i <br />