Laserfiche WebLink
' 15 November 1995 <br /> �J AGE-NC Project No 95-0142 <br />' Page 4 of 19 <br />' feet and a second plug emplaced using,bentomte pellets to make a 3-foot plug to a depth of 5 feet <br /> The wells were then grouted to the surface with Portland cement <br />' _ 3 4 ANALYTICAL RESULTSF SOIL SAMPLES O <br />' A total of five soil samples were submitted to MAI for analysis, all samples analyzed were collected <br /> from depths of40 or 45 feet bsg TPH-g was detected in sample VE1-40 (near former UST TK1-9) <br /> at 2,900 mg/kg(parts per million ppm),BTE&X were detected in the same sample at concentrations <br />' up to 260 ppm Low concentrations of TPH-g and BTE&X were also detected in each of the other <br /> four samples submitted for analysts Arialytical results of the soil samples are summarized in Table <br />' 1 The laboratory report and chains-of-custody are included in Appendix B <br /> Samples VE1-15 and VE3-35 were submitted for physicochemical analysts and microbiological <br /> enumeration Analytical results of the samples indicated poor microbe viability and low <br />' concentrations of nitrogen and oxygen(required for microbe growth) Low microbe populations may <br /> in part be due to the presence of hydrogen sulfide gas in the soil, which could be smelled during <br /> drilling Hydrogen sulfide is the byproduct of anaerobic digestion, which indicates low oxygen <br /> concentrations in the environment The microbiological laboratory report and chain-of-custody form <br /> are included in Appendix C <br /> 4.0. QUARTERLY GROUND WATER MONITORING, SEPTEMBER 11995 <br /> t` 4 1 GROUND WATER MONITORING PROCEDURES <br /> On 29 September 1995, a Sohnst water level was used to measure the depth to ground water in each <br /> of the four ground water monitoring wells at the site The relative ground water elevation in each well <br /> and hydraulic gradient were determine from these data points(Table 2) Each monitoring well was <br /> then purged of 8 to 40 gallons of water(a minimum of 3 well volumes), using a PVC and stainless <br /> steel submersible pump The pump was washed in an Alconox solution and rinsed with water <br /> between each purging to avoid cross-contamination Temperature, pH, and conductivity were <br />' measure at ten-gallon intervals (two-gallon interval for MW-4) using an ICM water analyzer <br /> Monitoring well stabilization data and field data sheets are included in Appendix D Purged water was <br /> stored on-site in 55-gallon drums, pending laboratory analysis <br />' 4 2 COLLECTION OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Water samples were collected from each purged well using new, clean disposable plastic bailers <br /> Immediately upon retrieval, the samples were transferred into 40-m1 VOA vials, preserved with <br />