Laserfiche WebLink
I r <br /> , r i <br /> 1 <br /> y I <br /> 23 November 1998 - <br /> AGE-NC Project`No 95-0142 ` <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> , - <br /> . <br />' water was stored on-site in labeled 55-gallon drums <br />' 22 GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br /> Water samples were collected from each purged well(MW-3, MW4,MW-5,VW-I through VW-4) ' <br />' using new,clean,disposable plastic bailers Immediately upon retrieval,the samples were transferred <br /> into EPA-approved 40-m1 VOA vials containing 0 5 milliliter hydrochloric acid (18%) as a sample <br /> preservative The vials were then labeled and placed in a chilled container The samples were <br />' transported in under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI) a state-certified <br /> laboratory m Pacheco, California for analysis Ground water samples were analyzed In accordance 1 e <br /> with the following <br /> 1 <br /> • EPA Method 8015m for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g), <br /> • EPA Method 8020 for volatile aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene,toluene, ethyl-benzene and <br />- - - total xyelens BTEX, <br />�• 0 EPA Method 8260m for,di-isopropyl ether(DIPS),ethyl tertiary butyl ether(ETBE),methyl <br /> tertiary butyl ether(MTBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether(TAME) and tertiary butyl alcohol <br /> (TBA) <br /> 3.0.- FINDINGS <br /> The, ground water flow direction and gradient were calculated from the filed data The current <br />' distribution of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons was inferred the laboratory analyses of the ground, <br /> water samples <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> 3 1 GROUNDWATER GRADIENT AND DIRECTION ; <br /> Depth to ground water at the site ranged from 25 73 feet to 26 80 feet below the well casing tops <br /> Between June and September the average,ground water elevation decreased 0 7 feet The relative <br /> ground water elevation data is depicted in Table I - <br /> The ground water elevation gradient for the water surfaces was calculated to be 0 0024 feet/feet or <br /> 12 9 feet/mile During the September monitoring event,the ground water flow direction and water <br /> surface appeared to be directed toward well MW4 The relative elevation of ground water surface <br /> at the site Is illustrated on Figure 3 <br /> Advanced Geo£nvnronmental,Inc. <br />