Laserfiche WebLink
' 24 October 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0142 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />' 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br /> After allowing the monitoring wells to achieve a minimum of 80,%recovery of the pre-purge water <br />' volume,water samples were collected from each well using the dedicated polyethylene bailers The <br /> water was then transferred into EPA-approved 40-milliliter (ml) volatile organic analysis (VOA) <br /> vials containing 0 5 ml hydrochloric acid(18%)as a sample preservative The vials were labeled and <br />' placed in a chilled container for subsequent transport under chain-of-custody to McCampbell <br /> Analytical, Inc (MAI), a State of California Department of Health Services (DHS) certified , <br /> laboratory Ground water samples were analyzed for the following <br /> 1 ,. <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g)in accordance with EPA Method 8015- <br /> Modified, and <br />' Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene and total xylenes(BTEX)and the oxygenated fuel additives <br /> methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), di-isopropyl ether (D1PE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether <br />' (ETBE),tertiary-amyl methyl ether(TAME)and tertiary butanol(TBA),methanol, ethanol, <br /> ethylene dibromide (EDB) and 1,2-dzchloroethane (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA <br /> Method 8260B, respectively <br />' 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected In <br /> September 2003 The contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by the ground water <br /> laboratory data <br /> 4 A <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND DIRECTION <br />' Depth to ground water at the site ranged between 29 26 feet and 30 23 feet below the tops of the well <br /> casings The ground water elevation in the wells ranged from 16 65 feet (1\4W-1) to 17 25 feet <br /> (MW-8)below mean sea level(MSL) The average ground water elevation decreased approximately <br />' 0 86 feet since the previous momtonng event The elevation and ground water depth data is depicted <br /> in Table 1 <br />' During this monitoring event, the general ground water flow direction in the shallow ground water <br /> r table(vapor wells)was toward the northeast at an average hydraulic gradient of 0 0035 foot/foot and <br /> less The elevation of the ground water table at the site is illustrated on Figure 3 <br /> i - <br />' Advanced GeoEnvtronmental,Inc <br />