Laserfiche WebLink
T• <br /> FEASIBILITY TESTING OF ON-SITE GROUND WATER EXTRACTION <br />' In Corrective Action Plan - November 1995, dated 15 November 1995, AGE recommended <br /> • implementation of soil vapor extraction in conjunction with in-situ air sparging for remediation of <br />' the petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil and ground water at the site At the time the CAP was <br /> prepared,ground water extraction was generally not viewed as an effective and cost efficient method <br /> of ground water remediation,but this method has gained more favor recently as a method to address <br />' impacted ground water when other technologies (e g , air-sparging) may not be controllable or <br /> effective, due in part to reduced extracted water treatment and disposal costs <br />' Since the approval of the CAP in December 1995,the local and regional ground water elevation has <br /> risen significantly(20 feet)and has maintained a depth-to-water of approximately 25 feet bsg AGE <br /> believes that the sustained increase of ground water elevation has significantly decreased the <br />' potential effectiveness of the proposed S VE/IAS method as a stand alone treatment for impacted soil <br /> and ground water, due to a reduction in thickness of the impacted vadose zone and an increase in <br />' thickness,and volume,of impacted soil(and ground water)in the saturated zone The impacted soil <br /> is primarily fine grained, which may make the upward and lateral path of sparged air through the <br /> saturated zone unpredictable and stripped hydrocarbons unrecoverable <br /> The vertical extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil had not been fully assessed when the CAP was <br /> developed The mass of adsorbed hydrocarbons now known to be within the saturated zone is <br />' significant,recent evaluation of soil and ground water below 50 feet bsg has documented significant <br /> concentrations of dissolved and adsorbed hydrocarbons that must be satisfactory mitigated to achieve <br /> site closure <br /> 1 } <br /> At the present time,dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations are known to extend to 80 feet bsg,where <br /> low concentrations suggest that 80 feet bsg is close to the dissolved plume's vertical extent The <br /> anticipated limited overall effectiveness and reliability of IAS technology to remediate the impacted <br /> soil and ground water require a re-evaluation of this proposed method <br />' AGE conducted a ground water extraction pumping test on 18 October 2001 Analysis of the ground <br /> water extraction data indicted that ex-situ ground water treatment was feasible, the radius of <br /> influence generated by a pumping rate of five gallons per minute was interpreted to,be adequate to <br />' control further off-site migration of contaminants toward the east, in the predominantly down- <br /> gradient direction The results of the pumping tests were reported in the AGE-prepared Ground <br />' Water Extraction Pilot Test Report dated 31 January 2002 <br /> The January 2002 report stated that the soil at the site has a high percentage of fine-grained matrix <br />' and overall is homogenous and mostly fine-grained In general this soil type has a high adsorption <br /> capacity and low permeability, and thereby could potentially limit migration of dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons However,despite the fine-grained nature of the soil,the feasibility test results showed <br />' that ground water extraction should be effective on the site The ground water extraction rates during <br /> full-scale remediation are not likely to exceed the pilot test extraction rate(five gallons per minute), <br /> and may be less for effective ground water extraction and stabilized drawdown <br /> 1 <br />' Advanced GeciEnvironmental,Inc <br /> 1 <br />