Laserfiche WebLink
. 15 Apri12004 ' <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0142 <br /> IPage 2 of 4 <br /> The water was then transferred into EPA-approved 40-milliliter(ml)volatile organic analysis(VOA) <br />' vials containing 0 5 ml hydrochloric acid(18%)as a sample preservative The vials were labeled and <br /> placed in a chilled container for subsequent transport under chain-of custody ,to McCampbell <br />' Analytical, Inc (MAI), a State of California Department of Health Services (DHS) certified <br /> laboratory Ground water samples were analyzed for the following <br />' Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) in accordance with EPA Method 8015- <br /> Modified, and <br /> • Benzene,toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes(BTEX)and the oxygenated fuel additives <br />' methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), d>-isopropyl ether (DIPS), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether <br /> (ETBE),tertiary-amyl methyl ether(TAME)and tertiary butanol (TBA),methanol, ethanol, <br /> ethylene d>bromide (EDB) and 1,2-d;ichloroethane (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA <br />' Method 8260B, respectively <br />' 3.0 FINDINGS <br />' • Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected in <br /> February 2004 The contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by the ground water <br />' laboratory data <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND DIRECTION <br /> Depth to ground water at the site ranged between 29 20 feet and 30 27 feet below the tops of the- <br /> monitoring well casings The ground water elevation in the wells ranged from 16 76 feet (MW-1) <br /> to 17 55 feet (MW-3)below mean sea level (MSL) The average ground water elevation increased <br /> 0 1 feet since the previous monitoring event Ground water elevation data from extractions wells <br />' were not utilized, due to the modified of the casing elevations caused by development of the <br /> remediation system on the site The elevation and'ground water depth data is depicted in Table 1 <br />' During this monitoring event, the general ground water flow direction in the ground water <br /> monitoring wells surrounding the former UST release was towards the north to northwest at an <br /> average hydraulic gradient of 0 014 ft/ft The elevation of the ground water table at the site is <br />' illustrated on Figure 3 <br /> tAdvanced GeoEnvironmental Inc <br />