My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007816
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
632
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0505525
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007816
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2019 6:49:25 PM
Creation date
7/15/2019 4:32:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007816
RECORD_ID
PR0505525
PE
2953
FACILITY_ID
FA0002387
FACILITY_NAME
KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
632
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14907033
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
632 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
07 July 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0142 <br /> IPage 4 of 7 <br /> collected from the deep screened well MW-6 (screened 70 to 80 feet bsg), located at the <br /> former UST TK1-90 area, the benzene was not detected from sample collected during the <br /> 03 March 2003 sampling, as compared to the initial value of 7,000 µg/1 detected on <br /> 11 December 1998 <br /> ' The lateral extent of <br /> TPH/BTEX-impacted acted ground water has been assessed down-gradient <br /> p <br /> and cross-gradient of the former UST area While the lateral and vertical extent of MTBE- <br /> impacted ground water has not assessed below a concentration of 20 µg/1 down-gradient of <br /> the former UST area (Figure 4) <br /> SITE REPORTING <br /> In Corrective Action Plan - November 1995, dated 15,November 1995, AGE- recommended <br /> implementation of soil vapor extraction in conjunction with In-situ air sparging for remediation of <br />' the petroleum hydrocarbon-Impacted soil and ground water at the site At the time the CAP was <br /> prepared,ground water extraction was generally not viewed as an effective and cost efficient method <br /> of ground water remediation,but this method has gained more favor recently as a method to address <br /> lie impacted ground water (i e MTBE) when other technologies (e g , air-sparging) may not be <br /> controllable or effective Since the approval of the CAP in December 1995, the local and regional <br />' ground water elevation has risen significantly (20 feet) and has maintained a depth-to-water of <br /> approximately 25 feet bsg The vertical extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil had not been fully <br /> assessed when the CAP was developed The mass of adsorbed hydrocarbons now known to be within <br />' the saturated zone is significant, recent evaluation of soil and ground water below 50 feet bsg has <br /> documented significant concentrations of dissolved and adsorbed hydrocarbons that must be <br /> satisfactory mitigated to achieve site closure AGE concluded that due to the sustained Increase of <br />' ground water elevation, yielding a reduction In thickness of the Impacted vadose zone and an <br /> increase in thickness, and volume, of impacted soil (and ground water) in the saturated,zone, had <br /> significantly decreased the effectiveness of the proposed SVE/IAS method as a stand alone treatment <br />' for impacted soil and ground water Additionally, the impacted soil is primarily fine grained with <br /> discontinuous sand units, which makes the upward and lateral path of sparged air through the <br /> saturated zone unpredictable and stripped hydrocarbons unrecoverable,with the added potential for <br />' dispersion of the dissolved MTBE The dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations are known to extend <br /> to 80 feet bsg, where low concentrations suggest that 80 feet bsg is the dissolved plume's vertical <br /> extent The anticipated limited overall effectiveness and reliability of IAS technology to remediate <br />' the Impacted soil and ground water require a re-evaluation of this proposed method <br /> In Ground Water Extraction Pilot Test Report dated 31 January 2002 AGE recommended <br />' Implementation of ground water extraction as an alternative ground water remediation technique <br /> aat the site Ground water extraction should provide adequate capture of the dissolved hydrocarbons, <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.