Laserfiche WebLink
lie 01 November 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0142 <br />' Page 3 of 8 <br />' • Fuel additives di-isopropyl ether(DIPS),ethyl tertiary-butyl ether(ETBE),MTBE, tertiary- <br /> amyl methyl ether(TAME)and tertiary butanol(TBA),also in accordance with EPA Method <br /> 8260B, and <br /> - <br />' • pH - effluent in accordance with EPA Method 150 1 <br />' 23 GROUND WATER MONITORING <br /> t Monitoring and sampling was performed in accordance with guidelines issued by the Central Valley <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) and conforms to ground water monitoring <br /> guidelines issued by the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department(EHD) In addition, <br />' <br /> field work was conducted in accordance with the EHD-approved work plan Installation of Depth <br /> Discrete Wells, dated 10 December 1999 <br /> 2 3 1 Well Monitoring and Purging - <br />' . On 24 June and l9 September 2005, a Solmst water level meter was used to measure the depth to <br /> ground water in eight monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-8) and during the September <br />' monitoring selected vapor wells (VW-2 and VW-4) After ground water depth measurements, a <br /> minimum of three casing-water volumes of water were removed from monitoring wells MW-4 <br /> through MW-8 using dedicated polyethylene tubing and a Waterra inertia pump The top of the <br />' screened interval in wells MW-1 through MW-3 was approximately 15 feet below static water level, <br /> located beyond the point of reasonable use for determining the chemical condition of the ground <br /> water near the former UST area and therefore, these wells were not purged or sampled <br /> Temperature,pH,and electrical conductivity were measured at regular purge-volume intervals using <br /> an Oakton water analyzer Purge water stabilization field data sheets are included in Appendix B f <br /> Purged water was transferred from a Department of Transportation(DOT)-approved 55-gallon drum, , <br />' pumped into the on-site ground water treatment system for disposal <br /> 2 3 2 Ground Water Sample Collection <br />' After allowing the monitoring wells to achieve a minimum of 80%recovery of the pre-purge water <br /> volume, water samples were collected from each well using the dedicated polyethylene tubing <br /> The water was then transferred into EPA-approved 40 ml VOA vials containing 0 5 ml hydrochloric <br /> acid-(18%) as a sample preservative The vials were labeled and placed in a chilled container for <br /> • <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />