Laserfiche WebLink
Ms Lori Duncan <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Monitoring wells MW 1 through MW4 were monitored for water level elevations and wells MW 1, MW2 <br /> and MW4 were purged and sampled on June 10, 2002 No samples were collected from well MW3 due <br /> to the presence of free product The depths to water in wells MW1, MW2, and MW4 were monitored <br /> using an electronic water level indicator The depth to water and depth to product in well MW3 was <br /> measured using an electronic water/hydrocarbon interface probe <br /> Groundwater elevations were calculated by subtracting the measured depth to groundwater in each well <br /> from the respective wellhead elevation The depth to groundwater in the wells on June 10, 2002 ranged <br /> from 22 62 to 23 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) Groundwater fell approximately 0 11 feet <br /> between March 12, 2002 and June 10, 2002 Groundwater flowed in a northeasterly direction with an <br /> average gradient of 0 003 ft/ft, or approximately 16 ft/mile A potentiometric surface map for June 10, <br /> 2002 is shown on Figure 2 Groundwater monitoring data are summarized in Table 2 Monitoring data <br /> sheets are included in Attachment B <br /> Groundwater Sampling <br /> Due to the presence of free product in well MW3, groundwater samples were only collected from wells <br /> MW 1, MW2 and MW4 A minimum of three well casing volumes of water was purged from each well <br /> using a bailer prior to collecting groundwater samples The physical parameters of temperature, pH and <br /> electrical conductivity were measured during the purging process All downhole equipment was <br /> decontaminated between wells using a solution of laboratory-grade detergent, then double rinsing in <br /> separate containers of clean rinse water <br /> Groundwater samples were collected using dedicated, disposable bailers after the physical parameters <br /> had stabilized and water levels recovered to within 80% of their pre-purged levels The samples were <br /> placed into an ice chest refrigerated to approximately 4°C and transported to Argon Laboratories (ELAP <br /> #2359)under chain of custody protocol Well purge logs are included in Attachment B <br /> GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs, includmg oxygenated gasoline additives and the lead <br /> scavengers 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) using EPA method 8260B <br /> No samples were collected from well MW3 due to the presence of free product <br /> No oxygenated gasoline additives, EDB or 1,2-DCA were detected in the groundwater samples collected <br /> from wells MWl, MW2, or MW4 <br /> PCE was detected in wells MW1, MW2, and MW4 at concentrations of 20 parts per billion (ppb), 17 <br /> ppb, and 17 ppb, respectively Chloroform was also detected in wells MW 1, MW2, and MW4 at 3 0 <br /> ppb, 2 5 ppb, and 3 1 ppb, respectively <br /> Only PCE was detected at levels exceeding its primary Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) established <br /> by the State of California Department of Health Services The established primary MCL for PCE is 5 0 <br /> ppb Groundwater analytical results are summarized in Table 3 Attachment C contains laboratory <br /> 0 1Data1GROUNDZEIGABBARDIreports�2QM2002 doc <br />