Laserfiche WebLink
,• E <br /> a <br /> Ms Lon Duncan <br /> April 4, 2000 <br /> 0 Page 2 of 6 <br /> entrance and approximately 53 feet west of the entrance to the alley that borders the east side of the <br /> building The UST was removed under permit from San Joaquin County Public Health Services, <br /> Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) on March 26, 1997 A soil sample collected from beneath <br /> the tank contained elevated levels of petroleum hydrocarbons, lead, and chlorinated solvents Analytical <br /> results are summarized in Table 1 Based on these data, PHS/EHD requested a workplan to investigate <br /> the lateral and vertical extent of contamination <br /> The August 24, 1998 Workplan prepared by Ground Zero proposed a general scope of work <br /> consisting of drilling and sampling soil borings in the vicinity of the former UST to further <br /> investigate the vertical and lateral extent of residual soil contamination and to determine of <br /> groundwater had been impacted <br /> The initial investigation, performed on January 19, 1999, determined that soil and groundwater in the <br /> vicinity of the former waste oil UST has been impacted by petroleum hydrocarbon constituents and lead <br /> The vertical extent of soil contammation in the vicinity of the former waste oil tank has been defined <br /> However, due to slow drilling progress attributed to very tight soil conditions, only three of the four <br /> proposed borings were completed and the full lateral extent of soil and groundwater contamination <br /> could not be determined Analytical results of the initial investigation are presented in Tables 2 and 3 <br /> Soil boring locations are shown on Figure 2 <br /> The results of the investigation were presented to PHS/EHD in the Subsurface Invesugatron Summary <br /> Report(Ground Zero Analysis,May 20, 1999) By letter dated June 21, 1999 PHS/EHD commented on <br /> the report and directed the responsible party to submit a workplan for additional investigation A <br /> workplan addendum for additional investigation was submitted to PHS/EHD on August 19, 1999 <br /> Investigations Undertaken <br /> Per the directive of San Joaquin County PHS/EHD, five additional soil borings were advanced <br /> by Ground Zero to further define the extent of soil and groundwater contamination at the site <br /> Boring SB4 was located approximately 15 feet southeast of the former UST, boring SB5 was <br /> located approximately 8 feet east of the former UST, boring SB6 was located approximately 19 <br /> feet northwest of the former UST, boring SB7 was located approximately 39 feet northwest of <br /> the former UST, and boring SB8 was located approximately 36 feet north of the former UST <br /> Soil boring locations are shown on Figure 2 <br /> INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES <br /> On October 26 and 27, 1999, Sean Garvey of Ground Zero supervised the subsurface investigation in the <br /> vicinity of the former UST Ms. Lori Duncan of San Joaquin County PHS/EHD conducted the site <br /> inspection and observed field activities <br /> Fisch advanced the borings under the supervision of field geologist Sean Garvey, and project manager <br /> John Lane, a California Registered Geologist Bonngs SB4, SB5, SB7 and SBS were advanced to <br /> depths of approximately 31 feet below ground surface (bgs), and boring SB6 was advanced to <br />. approximately 37 feet bgs Fisch utilized a truck mounted Geoprobe 5400 direct push ng to advance <br /> the borings and collect soil samples Soil samples were collected at 5-foot intervals using a 1 % -inch <br /> diameter by 24-mch long core sampler The sampler was lined with clear acetate sleeves, affording <br /> sroundzelgabbudladd_bonng_tpt doe <br />