Laserfiche WebLink
14 May 2002 <br /> . AGE-NC Prot ect No 98-0426 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />' compounds and MTBE were detected in the grab ground water samples from two of the three <br /> borings <br /> f <br /> IBased on the soil probe and monitoring well boring results, the vertical extent of impacted soil <br /> beneath the former USTs appears to be defined Also,petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in <br /> soil samples analyzed from borings B1, B2, B4, B5, B6, MW4 and MW5, thereby defining the <br /> lateral extent of impacted soil <br /> Ground water monitoring has been performed at the site since October 1999 Ground water gradient <br /> determinations have indicated a consistently northeast ground-water flow Hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> ground water appears to be limited to the former UST and dispenser area <br /> Complete background information and details of previous investigations at the site were detailed in <br /> AGE's Preliminary Investigation and Evaluation Report-March 1999, dated 26 March 1999, and <br /> Additional Site Assessment and Monitoring Well Installation Report, dated 05 March 2002 <br /> 3.0. PROCEDURES <br /> Field work was performed in accordance with guidelines established by the California Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board-Central Valley Division for investigation of underground storage tank <br /> (UST)sites Ground water monitoring procedures were performed as outlined in the AGE-prepared <br /> Monitoring Well Installation Work Plan dated 29 July 1999,as approved by the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department (EHD)by letter dated 03 August 1999 <br /> 3 1 WELL MONITORING AND EVACUATION <br /> On 15 November 2001, a Solinst water level meter was used to measure the depth to ground water <br /> in the three wells(MW 1 through MW5)'relative to the tops of the well casings The relative ground <br /> water elevations and gradient were determined from these data(Table 1) <br /> Ater the depth-to-ground water measurements were collected,the monitoring wells were purged of <br /> standing water using new disposable plastic bailers Approximately 5 to 6 gallons of water, a <br /> minimum of 3 casing-water volumes, were removed from the monitoring wells Ground water <br /> temperature,pH and conductivity were measured at approximately 1-gallon intervals during purging <br /> using an Oakton water analyzer Field sheets and data are included in Appendix A Purged water was <br />' stored on site in labeled, 55-gallon DOT-approved drums <br /> • <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentat,Inc <br /> 1 <br />