Laserfiche WebLink
16 October 2001 ti <br /> AGE-NC Protect No 98-0426 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> I I <br /> No fuel oxygenates were detected above laboratory reporting limits in any of the ground water <br /> samples collected <br /> I The current and historical ground water analytical results are summarized on Table 2 The laboratory <br /> report(MAI Lab I D No 75681 through 75683), chain-of custody form and the laboratory QA/QC <br /> report are included in AppendI ix B <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS w <br /> Based on the data collected during this monitoring period, AGE concludes <br /> r <br /> • Ground water flow at the site was toward the northeast which is consistent with the May <br /> 2001 monitoring event and regional trends The ground water elevation has increased <br /> approximately 1 1 feet since the May 2001 sampling event <br /> I V TPH-g was detected in the ground water sample from MW 1, TPH-g concentrations increased <br /> in the sample from MW3 this quarter compared to the May 2001 sampling event <br /> BTEX compounds were not detected in the sample from MW-1,but various BTEX <br /> compounds were detected in the samples from MW-2 and MW-3 <br /> O MTBE concentrations remained at non'-detectable levels for the fourth consecutive quarter <br /> 1 I I f I .. ' 1 , ' F • I r <br /> 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> AGE recommends the following <br /> • Continued quarterly monitoring of the groundwater monitoring wells The next monitoring <br /> event will be performed in December 2001 <br /> • Discontinue analyses fo'r fuel oxygenates <br /> AGE installed two additional ground water wells on 24 September 2001 in the down-gradient and <br /> eastern cross'gradient directions from monitoring well MW3,and advanced three soil bonngs on 01 <br /> through 03 betober 2001 'to define"vertical and lateral extent of contamination (Figure 2) The <br /> findings from the additional site investigations'will be submitted in a subsequent report <br /> I 1 K I <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />