Laserfiche WebLink
�- m , <br /> Ro(ect Number, SF13.175-o2o4.72 <br /> ConsuRant Protect Number: 203.1753289 <br /> Contractrr,:rnber: k45CWCO244•9.X <br /> FaciRy NumLar. D-DUZ <br /> Work Order Numbed C007158 <br /> P&POn k4ue date: Juy 24,1990 <br /> CIA Conformance Summary <br /> Purgeabla Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons <br /> as Gasoline In Soil <br /> EPA Method 8020/8015 <br /> �., 1.0 nnU <br /> Five of 5 target compounds were Wow detection limits in the reagent waterblank and reagent <br /> methanol blank as shown In Tables 2a and 2b. <br /> 2.0 Waperxlent QC ChfiQ�Sample <br /> The control Ilmhs wero met for 4 out of 4 QC check compounds as showm In Table 3. <br /> t a 3.0 SUrroagle CoMpgUnd Rgcoyerle.* <br /> Percent recovery limits were met for the surrogate compound(naphthalene)for all samples <br /> ..- as shown In Table 4. <br /> 4.0 Matdg Spike(MS)and Matrix Spike bu icate fMSD)Accuracy and Precision <br /> 4.1 Percent racovery limits were met for 4 of 4 compounds In the MS and MSD as shown In Table <br /> 4.2 Relative percent difference(RPD)criteria was met for 4 of 4 analytes In the MS and MSD as <br /> ! shown In Table 5. <br /> 5.0 ;?ample Handling " <br /> 5.1 Sample handling and holding time criteria were met for all samples. <br /> 01 5.2 There were no exceptional corldlticns requiring dilution of samples. <br /> r r <br /> GTEL C.ancord,CA Page 3 of 7 <br /> 0001158.DOC <br /> GTE <br /> ENY I Now Yl NTAr <br /> : IA004ATOOZEi, lNe <br /> ,j- <br /> i� <br />