My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012681
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
1347
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544667
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012681
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2019 3:48:06 PM
Creation date
7/17/2019 11:16:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012681
RECORD_ID
PR0544667
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004962
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON 90342 (INACT)
STREET_NUMBER
1347
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14716030
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1347 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
442
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Project Number: SFe-i7542o4.72 <br /> Consultant Project Number: 203.175-3289 <br /> CanVact Number: N46CW002"%X <br /> Facility Number. 9-0342 <br /> Work Order Number: Co08555 <br /> Report issue Dsts: August 28,1990 <br /> I <br /> j <br /> Rw QA Conformance 3umrnary <br /> s Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons <br /> as Gasoline In Water <br /> EPA Method 8020/8015 <br /> I ' <br /> LY <br /> 1.0 Vianki <br /> Five of 5 target compounds were below detection limits in the reagent blank as shown In Table <br /> 2 <br /> i as <br /> 2.0 ICdep2nd,,nJQQ fleckSamote <br /> The contro:limits were met for 4 out of 4 QC check compounds as shown In Table 3. <br /> ` t 30 r <br /> Percent recovery limits were met for the surror Me compound(naphthalene)for all samples <br /> as shown In Table 4. <br /> 4.0 MIlrlx Sp[kQf SI-AccuraQ <br /> i.. Percent recovery limits were met for 4 of 4 compounds In the MS as shown In Table S. <br /> 5.0 3 Water Spike MaD) li I l <br /> Relative percent difference(RPD)criteria was met for 4 of 4 analytes In the WS and WSD as <br /> shown In Table 6. <br /> i-1 6.0 Samole Handling <br /> 6.1 Sample handling and holding time criteria were met for all samples. <br /> r; 6.2 There were no exceptional conditions requiring dilution of samples. <br /> l <br /> rM . <br /> is <br /> LJ OTEL Conoord.CA Page 2 at 7 <br /> I ODDMW.DOC <br /> r� f GTE L <br /> r re <br /> 'l. fNVf�ONati NiA3 <br /> _ - =111 SA1101MOe11S. INC. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.