Laserfiche WebLink
R604 :UPDATE 9-MARCH, 1992 <br />• OPERATION UNDER AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT PERMIT # AP 91-106 . <br /> The Authority to Construct (Permit No . AP 91-106 ) was issued on <br /> February 24, 1992 . Once the carbon scrub units were received <br /> (after rejuvenation at Cameron - Yakima) , the vapor recovery <br /> system was remanifolded with 2 100 gallon carbon vapor scrub units <br /> (R1283 and R1284 ) placed in series behind one Rotron DR505 Blower. <br /> Vapor extraction wells P1 , P3 Swarm (P3-A, P3-D, and P3 ) , EX, <br /> along with ground water monitoring well MW5 , were attached to the <br /> manifold and the system was restarted at 12 : 35 PM on March 31, <br /> 1992 . The San Joaquin County Air Pollution Control Officer, <br /> Teresa Stuyt, was on hand to inspect the system. <br /> Under the Authority to Construct, the vapor extraction system must <br /> be monitored twice weekly, with three measurements of the effluent <br /> be performed for the first month, then monthly thereafter. Table <br /> 3B represents these measurements, see Appendix B for field notes <br /> and chromatograms, and Appendix C-Permit to Construct . <br /> System Operation <br /> On March 31 , 1992, the influent to the carbons was 4 . 02 pounds per <br /> day ( lbs/day) at a flow rate of 57 cubic feet per minute (cfm) and <br /> an effluent measurement from the last carbon of 0 . 32 lbs/day. <br /> This equates to a 92% absorption/destruction of the vapor stream <br /> hydrocarbons. <br /> The 57 cfm flow rate was not maintained, the blowers heat sensor <br /> shut the blower off for a 20 minute cool down. Once the blower <br /> came back on the pump bypass was used to decrease the flow rate to <br /> 28 . 7 cfm, which decreases the pounds per day to 2 . 02 on the <br /> influent and 0 . 05 on the effluent, ie, 97% absoption/destruction <br /> of the vapor stream hydrocarbons. <br /> On subsequent visits the flow rate ranged between 26 cfm to 32 cfm <br /> with the influent dropping from a high of 3 . 12 lbs/day on April 7 , <br /> 1992 to 1 . 45 lbs/day on April 14, 1992 . The effluent from the <br /> last carbon ranged from below detection limits to a high of 1 . 07 <br /> lbs/day. <br /> As can be seen when comparing the three per day effluent samples <br /> as shown on Table 3B (March 31 through April 14, 1992 ) , a slight <br /> bleedthrough (channeling) is occurring from the last carbon, even <br /> during the first minutes of operation. This channeling occurs as <br /> specific molecules of the contaminant in the vapor stream absorb <br /> and "desorb" from the carbon surfaces and are not trapped in the <br /> micro or macro pores of the carbon. This absorption-desorption <br /> along with the low concentration of the influent stream ( 3 . 12 to <br /> 1 . 56 lbs/day) , which allows the hydrocarbons to remain in <br /> equilibrium in the vapor stream, does not allow an effective <br /> absorption ( greater than 90% ) to occur. <br /> page 9 <br />