Laserfiche WebLink
UPDATE 27 4-22-94 <br /> to remain off since December 30, 1993 . The VES was operated for <br /> approximately fifteen minutes allowing enough time to purge the <br /> vapor recovery laterals of any ambient air and to allow formation <br /> gases to pass by the sample port . Once the sample was collected <br /> the VES was turned off. This sample was chain of custody <br /> delivered to MATRIX ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES for analysis using <br /> EPA method 8020/5030, TPHg/BTEX. Laboratory results indicated <br /> the absence of gasoline range hydrocarbons and BTEX' s in the <br /> vapor stream, see Laboratory Report - Appendix B. <br /> The February 2, 1994 site visit was for the scheduled <br /> drilling of confirmation soil sample borings At this time three <br /> soil sample borings were drilled by Woodward Drilling and soil <br /> sampling and screening was performed by a WEGE geologist <br /> Screening of the three borings indicated that some level of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons still existed in the areas of the borings <br /> and these boring were converted into two inch vapor extraction <br /> wells at that time, see Figure 3 , Table 4, and Appendix C - <br /> Workplan, Well Construction/Borehole Logs with Certified <br /> Laboratory Reports . <br /> Quarterly ground water sampling and restart of the VES occurred <br /> during a site visit on February 16, 1994 To show if the VES was <br /> giving false negatives to ground water sampling results, the VES <br /> was turned off on December 30, 1993 and was not restarted until <br /> after all water sa p es a een obtained on February 16 1994 <br /> Laboratory results indicate that the below c-ef-ecE'ion its for <br />. gasoline range hydrocarbons, benzene, toluene and ethylbenzene <br /> and the low levels of xylenes that have been seen in the wells <br /> for over a year dad not change when the VES was shut down. The <br /> VES was then hooked to vapor extraction wells VSB13 , VSB14, VSB15 <br /> and MW5 and restarted prior to leaving the site . <br /> On February 21, 1994 , a site visit occurred to sample the VES, <br /> see Table 3 A flow rate of approximately 30 cubic feet per <br /> minute (cfm) was maintained through the carbon scrubs . Of this <br /> flow the majority was produced from MW5, ie 23 24 cfm The <br /> remaining 6 . 76 cfm was produced from the newly installed wells <br /> VSB13, VSB14 , and VSB15 . An influent sample obtained at this <br /> time indicated that approximately 1 . 65 pounds per day of <br /> hydrocarbons was being recovered <br /> During the March 4, 1994 site visit vacuum influence and depth to <br /> water was measured at the well heads <br /> On March 23 , 1994 , a site visit was conducted to obtain <br /> influent/effluent samples from the VES and to measure vacuum <br /> influence at the well heads. A flow rate of 35 cfm was producing <br /> approximately 1 . 7 lbs/day gasoline from a vapor stream consisting <br /> Of 0 52 mg/L gasoline range hydrocarbons and 0 . 021 mg/L xylene . <br /> Benzene, toluene and ethylbenzene were all below detection limits <br /> Of 0 5 ug/L. <br /> page2 <br />