Laserfiche WebLink
R604 :UPDATE 22 9-17-1993 <br /> Sys tem operation: <br /> . Currently a flow rate that fluctuates between 82 cubic feet per <br /> minute and 80 cubic feet per minute is being maintained through <br /> the two blowers that are placed in series, prior to exhausting <br /> through 2 (in series) 110 gallon and one 85 gallon activated <br /> carbon vapor scrub units . These are serviced by Exceltran and <br /> Cameron Yakima for change-out and rejuvenation. From July 19, to <br /> August 20, 1993 the system has operated 630 hours and recovered <br /> 118 pounds of gasoline range hydrocarbons or approximately 3 .7 <br /> pounds per day, which is approximately a third of the production <br /> during the June, 1993 update status report of 9 . 8 pounds per <br /> day. <br /> METHODS AND QA/QC <br /> WELL SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES <br /> Depth to ground water and vacuum measurements were obtained from <br /> all of the ground water monitoring wells on August 20, 1993 <br /> Depth to top of fluid and ground water measurements were obtained <br /> using a clean product water interface probe. The probe, lowered <br /> into the well attached to a tape calibrated in 0 02 foot <br /> intervals, signals at the contact of floating product and at the <br /> top of ground water. The measurement is obtained from the <br /> calibrated tape reading adjacent to a reference point on the <br /> casing. The probe is cleaned with trisodium phosphate water <br /> followed by a distilled water rinse before measuring the next <br /> well . Measurements are started at the historically cleanest <br /> wells and progress to the dirtiest wells . All depth to ground <br /> water measurements were obtained before purging the wells for <br /> sampling. The depth to water is then subtracted from the <br /> elevation of the casing' s reference point for a corrected ground <br /> water elevation A computer generated gradient program was not <br /> utilized. The more interpretive gradient map was developed by <br /> calculating the gradient from each well to all surrounding wells <br /> (difference in ground water elevations/distance between wells) , <br /> "i .e If MW1 to MW2, MW to MW3 , MW1 to MW4 , and MW1 to MW6 Depth <br /> to ground water data from MW5 is not used; this well was <br /> installed in a slant boring and produced an anomalous high when <br /> used From these gradient lines, data points representing the <br /> contact for the proposed contours are plotted along each <br /> individual line Once the data points have been plotted between <br /> all the wells, the data points representing a given gradient <br /> elevation ( -45 foot contour, for example) are connected with site <br /> specific factors, "i e " incorporating conditions caused by local <br /> geology, hydrogeology, utility trenches, etc. These are used to <br /> control the contour between data points This site is presently <br /> being influenced by vapor extraction at MW5, VSB3 , VSB5, VSB9 and <br /> VSB11 A vacuum at these wells and surrounding wells will <br /> influence the shape of the ground water surface and subsequent <br /> flow directions of the ground water To obtain representative <br /> measurements that show the influence by the vacuum extraction at <br /> this site, a vacuum measurement is obtained at the well head <br /> before removing the cap and the subsequent depth to water <br /> measurement is corrected for the negative vacuum head <br /> (potentiometric head) <br /> page 4 <br />