Laserfiche WebLink
UPDATE 30 11-11-94 <br /> the wells on August 17, October 12, and November 7, 1993 . Depth <br /> to top of fluid and ground water measurements were obtained using <br /> a clean product water interface probe The probe, lowered into <br /> the well, by an attached tape calibrated in 0 02 foot intervals, s <br /> signals at the contact of floating product and at the top of <br /> ground water. The measurement is obtained from the calibrated <br /> tape reading adjacent to a reference point on the casing The <br /> probe is cleaned with trisodium phosphate water followed by a <br /> distilled water rinse before measuring the next well <br /> Measurements are started at the historically cleanest wells and <br /> Progress to the dirtiest well All depth to ground water <br /> measurements were obtained before purging the wells for sampling ✓ <br /> The depth to water is then subtracted from the elevation of the <br /> casing' s reference point for a corrected ground water elevation <br /> A computer generated gradient program was not utilized The more <br /> interpretive gradient map was developed by calculating the <br /> gradient from each well to all surrounding wells (difference in <br /> ground water elevations/distance between wells) , "i e . " . MW1 to <br /> MW2 , MW1 to MW3 , MW1 to MW4 , and MW1 to MW6 Depth to ground <br /> water data from MW5 is not used, this well was installed in a <br /> slant boring and produced an anomalous high when used From <br /> these gradient lines, data points representing the contact for <br /> the proposed contours are plotted along each individual line <br /> Once the data points have been plotted between all the wells, the <br /> data points representing a given gradient elevation ( -45 foot <br /> contour, for example) are connected with site specific factors, <br /> "z e it incorporating conditions caused by local geology, <br /> hydrogeology, utility trenches, etc These are used to control <br /> the contour between data points This site is presently being <br /> influenced by vapor extraction at MW5, VSB3 , VSB5, VSB9 and <br /> VSB11 A vacuum at these wells and surrounding wells will <br /> influence the shape of the ground water surface and subsequent <br /> flow directions of the ground water To obtain representative <br /> measurements that show the influence by the vacuum extraction at <br /> this site, a vacuum measurement is obtained at the well head <br /> before removing the cap and the subsequent depth to water <br /> measurement is corrected for the negative vacuum head <br /> (potentiometric head) <br /> Vapor Recovery System and Monitoring <br /> During the latest confirmation soil sample drilling which <br /> occurred on February 2 , 1994 , SB13 , S214 and SB15 were converted <br /> into vapor extraction wells These wells along with P3 , VSSS , <br /> VSB9, VSB11 and MW5 are presently utilized for vapor extraction, <br /> see Figure 3A These wells have been manifolded into the <br /> laterals of the above listed wells that are manifolded to a vapor <br /> extraction system with individual valved orifices for flow <br /> control and measurement The wells are fitted with a PVC tee <br /> head with a locking air tight cap, for well access . The tee <br /> lateral (2 inch) is fitted with a 1/4 inch pipe to tubing fitting <br /> for obtaining vacuum/pressure and temperature readings A pipe <br /> to hose 2 inch union is placed between the tee and the 2 inch PVC <br /> flex hose that connects the well to the extraction manifold At <br /> the manifold the wells are connected to their own 2 inch PVC <br /> pagell <br />