My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010492
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TAM O SHANTER
>
6215
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544683
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010492
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2019 3:09:29 PM
Creation date
7/22/2019 8:16:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010492
RECORD_ID
PR0544683
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004953
FACILITY_NAME
NORMAC INC
STREET_NUMBER
6215
STREET_NAME
TAM O SHANTER
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
09405011
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6215 TAM O SHANTER DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />' significantly over a period of 3'/z years However, a mass/volume estimate of gasoline was not <br /> included in the report <br /> In a letter dated January 25, 1995 PHS/EHD stated that based on the results of the additional <br />' investigation performed by Hunter, residual soil contamination remained at unacceptable levels, <br /> and recommended a groundwater investigation be conducted to determine groundwater conditions <br />' and gradient <br /> MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION <br /> 1 <br /> On October 24 and 25, 1995, Ground Zero observed V & W Drilling drill three soil borings <br />' (SB1 through S133) at locations shown on the attached Site Plan (Figure 2) During drilling, soil <br /> samples were collected at five foot intervals for logging and analytical purposes Boring logs <br /> are included in Attachment B <br />' Soil borings SB1 through S133 were drilled to depths of 80, 80, and 75 feet bgs, respectively <br /> Groundwater was first encountered at approximately 65, 68, and 67 feet bgs, and subsequently <br />' rose to approximately 63, 62, and 59 feet bgs, respectively The onsite stratigraphy, based on <br /> borings S131 and SB2, consisted of lean clay and elastic silt to approximately 29 feet bgs, well <br /> to poorly graded sand and well graded gravel from approximately 29 to 43 feet bgs, lean clay <br />' and elastic silt from approximately 43 to 53 feet bgs, silty sand to poorly graded sand from <br /> approximately 53 to 70/73 feet bgs with a lens of elastic silt in boring SB2 from approximately <br /> 58 to 68 feet bgs, and lean clay from 70/73 to 80 feet bgs, the maximum depth explored The <br /> offsite stratigraphy, based on boring SB3, is similar to a depth of approximately 38 feet bgs <br /> where lean clay was encountered to approximately 48 feet bgs, poorly graded sand from 48 to <br /> 75 feet bgs with a lean clay lens from 63 to 69 feet bgs The only noticeable hydrocarbon odor <br /> was very slight at 25 feet in SB1 <br /> Borings SBI through SB3 were completed as monitoring wells MW1 through MW3, <br />' respectively The wells are constructed of 2-inch diameter PVC casing with 0 020 inch slotted <br /> screen installed from the bottom of each of the borings to approximately 55, 60, and 55 feet bgs, <br />' respectively The annulus was completed with #2/12 sand filter pack to 1 to 2 feet above the <br /> screened interval, overlain by a two foot thick plug of bentonite, and completed with a cement <br /> slurry to ground surface The wellheads were surveyed by Wong Engineers, Inc with an <br />' accuracy of 0 01 feet relative to mean sea level Wellhead survey information is included in <br /> Attachment C <br />' MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> The wells were developed on November 1, 1995 by Del-Tech Geotechnical Support Field <br />' reports are included in Attachment C The depth to bottom in each of the wells was significantly <br /> higher than when installed During development, the groundwater was turbid and had a high <br /> pH indicating a possible influx of cement grout into the well casing Wells MWI. and MW2 <br /> eventually cleared, but MW3 did not <br /> groundzelnormaclsumrepor 95 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.