My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010495
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TAM O SHANTER
>
6215
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544683
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010495
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2019 3:07:22 PM
Creation date
7/22/2019 8:17:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010495
RECORD_ID
PR0544683
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004953
FACILITY_NAME
NORMAC INC
STREET_NUMBER
6215
STREET_NAME
TAM O SHANTER
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
09405011
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6215 TAM O SHANTER DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
duct tape The tube was labeled & placed on ace pending trans- <br /> port to FGL laboratory for analysis. The probe of a field cali- <br /> brated PID meter was inserted into the plastic bag & readings <br /> were recorded. All unused core material and drill cuttings were <br /> placed in metal drums. <br /> Cores were taken at the following intervals as specified by the <br /> approved workplan addendum: 20' -22' 6" . 25' --27' 6" , 30' -32' 6" <br /> 35' -37' 6 & 40' --42' 6 Sampling & presery-.ng was done in the <br /> same manner described an the above paragraph_ Details of the <br /> lithology, core recovery, PID readings, and other relevant data <br /> are shown on the attached PLATE C <br /> The auger rig was then relocated on the Normac property at <br /> Location "B" as shown on PLATE B. The drilling company had <br /> sufficient clean auger flights on location so that it was not <br /> necessary to decontaminate the ones previously used. Using the <br /> same field procedures described above, soil samples were taken at <br /> the following intervals: 20 ' -226" , 25' -27' 6" , 30' -32' 6" <br /> 35' -37' 6" , and 40' -42' 6" . The attached PLATE D gives details of <br /> that work. Unused core material and drill cuttings were placed <br /> in metal drums, marked for identification, and stored on site. <br /> Upon completion of drilling operations, both borings were <br /> grouted to the surface with cement which was thoroughly blended <br /> by use of a portable mixer; the slurry was placed in the hole by <br /> use of a flexible hose. Cementing operations were witnessed by <br /> Mr. Harlen Knoll, REHS, of the San Joaquin County EHD. <br /> The preserved soil samples were transported by Wm. Hunter under <br /> chain of custody to FGL Environmental laboratory with instruct- <br /> ions to test for BTEX & TPH--G <br /> DISCUSSION OF RESULTS OF ABOVE WORK: <br /> The results of the laboratory analyzes of the above soil samples <br /> are tabulated on TABLE VIZI ; copies of the lab worksheets and <br /> chain of custody are included as EXHIBITS C & D. <br /> LOCATION "A" - This auger hole, located on Hammertown Partners <br /> property, was placed as close to soil boring B-5 as possible, <br /> (work done an Oct , 1990, ) which had measured minor amounts of <br /> benzene, ethylbenaene, & toluene in a soil sample taken at 25' <br /> bgl. The purpose was to evaluate changes an levels of contamina- <br /> tion which may have occurred in the 3 1/2 years between sampling <br /> The first sample taken at 21 ' was below detection limits for BTEX <br /> & TPH-G. Benzene was measured at . 008 mg/kg an the sample at <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.