Laserfiche WebLink
I,n1 <br /> E C 0 R <br /> 7-Eleven Store#19976 <br /> Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation Progress Report(2Q2005) <br /> August 9, 2005 <br /> Page 5 1 <br /> On April 9, 2004, SECOR submitted a request with the SJCEHD to reduce sampling of <br /> MW-4 and MW-4A from quarterly to annually Approval was received in a letter from the vlp� <br /> SJCEHD dated July 28, 2004 ` <br /> On June 2, 2004 a 22-hour SVE event was conducted on the horizontal tank pit wells <br /> Based on soil vapor samples collected during the test it is estimated that approximately <br /> 0 10 pound of TPHg was removed in sod vapor during the 22-hour test No recordable ', <br /> amount of benzene or MtBE was removed during the test la ° <br /> On November 23, 2004, an additional SVE test was conducted on monitoring well MW-2 <br /> Based on the soil vapor samples collected during the five hour test, approximately 1 79 lbs k ' " <br /> of TPHg was removed No recordable amounts of benzene or MtBE were removed during ' <br /> the test <br /> r <br /> On March 15, 2005, SECOR submitted a Work Plan for OZ Sparge Well Installation to the <br /> SJCEHD This work plan details the proposed installation of three oxygen injection wells to <br /> improve the remediation at the site 1 <br /> 31,E <br /> In a letter dated May 3, 2005, the SJCEHD stated that the work plan would have to be <br /> approved by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) before the <br /> SJCEHD could comment on it The letter also directed 7-Eleven, Inc to sample MW-4 <br /> semi-annually and MW-4A quarterly <br /> On June 27, 2005, SECOR submitted a work plan for additional site assessment to the <br /> SJCEHD The work plan proposed the addition of MW-8 to the west of MW-2 The workr <br /> plan was approved in a letter dated July 11, 2005 >L4 <br /> MONITORING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES r <br /> The depth to water was measured to within 0 01 feet bgs in monitoring wells MW-1 through ' <br /> MW-7, MW-1A, MW-4A, and MW-5A from the top of casing (TOC) using a water level <br /> indicator Dissolved oxygen concentrations were measured in wells MW-1, MW-1A, MW-2, <br /> MW-3, MW-5, MW-5A, MW-6, and MW-7 using a YSI Model 550A dissolved oxygen meter <br /> equipped with a down hole sensor <br /> r' <br /> Well purging and sampling equipment was thoroughly cleaned prior to purging and <br /> sampling each well The sampling procedure for each well included measuring the water ' <br /> level and checking for the presence of liquid-phase hydrocarbons (LPH), using either an <br /> electronic indicator and a clear Teflon' bailer or an oil-water interface probe Wells not <br /> containing LPH were purged of approximately three casing volumes of water (or to dryness) <br /> using a submersible pump or bailer The equipment and purging methods used for the <br /> current sampling event were noted on the field data sheets shown in Attachment A During <br /> purging, temperature, pH, and electrical conductivity were monitored After purging, water <br /> levels were allowed to recover to 80% of the original levels prior to collection of the water <br /> sample Groundwater samples were collected using a disposable Teflon® bailer, placed <br /> into appropriate EPA-approved containers, labeled, logged onto chain-of-custody w <br /> documents, and transported on ice to a California state-certified laboratory Copies of the r4 <br /> . field notes are presented in Attachment A , <br /> y � <br /> r <br /> u� <br /> 19976 05-2Q Report doc SECOR Intematronal Incorporated Ffi <br /> ' 'I <br />