Laserfiche WebLink
MOM M ! M ' M M M MWW = I <br /> F <br /> FIGURE 5 <br /> GENERAL REMEDIATION FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS <br /> Malnx Remediation Altematives Overall Feasibility Eslrm Time to HealthfSafety Risks Site Uses Affected Cost Advantages Disadvantages <br /> Rem <br /> Sod& Electrokinesis Feasible Est 1 yr 1 yr Elecincal charge lsmded equipment Approximately Possibly more effective for Possible methods safety <br /> GW posi4em conductance space $350000 MTBE than some cleanup hazards <br /> mondonng methods <br /> Requires supplemental fuel and <br /> monaonno noir <br /> Sal& Sod vapor extractiord air Feasible Est 2 yrs+1 yr Low direct health nsks Limited equipment Approximately Less long term liability Requires supplemental fuel and <br /> GW sparge post rem when operating space $300000 beneficial use little affected monitoring nosy <br /> monitoring property <br /> Lower efficiency For MTBE than <br /> other volatiles <br /> GW Enhanced Intrinsic Feasible Est 2 yrs 1 yr Low direct health nsks Umded equipment Approximately Less long term liability Introduction of substances to <br /> Biodegradation post rem when operatrng space S320000 beneficial use little affected groundwater Documentation of <br /> monitonng property destruction rete less reliable <br />