Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> Additional Subsurface Investigation And Well Installation Report 5 <br /> The Southland 2oMration,Store#19976,1399 N Main St Manteca California November 15 1998 <br /> The top of casing and nm of each well box was surveyed in October 1998 by Morrow Surveying for <br /> horizontal position and elevation relative to mean sea level datum using the City of Manteca benchmark <br /> #16 (Elevation 33 00) located at the northwest comer of Northgate Drive and North Main Street as a <br /> reference The resultant map is included in Appendix B Field notes from the well Installation are <br /> included In Appendix C <br /> M <br /> 35 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling <br /> On September 16, 1998,depth to water in each well was measured to the nearest 0 01 foot from the top <br />' of the well casing using an interface probe Field data sheets are provided in Appendix C <br /> A potentiometnc surface map was prepared using the groundwater elevation data collected on <br /> September 16, 1998 (Figure 2) No separate-phase hydrocarbons (SP)were observed in the four <br /> groundwater monitoring wells during this monitoring event The groundwater monitoring results from the <br /> September 16, 1998 monitoring and sampling event are presented in Table 2 <br /> Pnor to groundwater purging, dissolved oxygen was measured in each well using a field instrument <br /> Dissolved oxygen data taken from four monitoring wells indicate depleted oxygen levels due to Intrinsic <br /> biodegradation Dissolved oxygen levels are higher in wells which have lower dissolved hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations Dissolved oxygen levels Indicate that natural attenuation through biodegradation is likely <br /> to continue at this site Dissolved oxygen readings taken ranged from 12 mg/L in MW-1A to 4 3 mg/L to <br /> MW-3(Table 2) <br /> Subsequent to mondonng,approximately four well volumes of water were removed from each monttonng <br /> well to ensure stabilization of pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature The purge water was stored in <br /> DOT-approved 55-gallon drums The groundwater samples were collected using disposable bailers, <br /> then transferred to 40-milliliter glass vials filled to zero headspace and acidified to a pH of 2 The <br /> ' samples were sealed using Teflon®-septum caps, labeled, placed on Ice in an insulated container, and <br /> transported under chain-of-custody to state-certified Core Laboratories in Anaheim, California The <br /> groundwater samples were analyzed for BTEX, and TPH-g using EPA Methods 8020/modified 8015, and <br /> for TBA, MTBE, DIPE, ETBE, and TAME by EPA Method 8260 <br /> All purge water generated during the monitoring and sampling event was stored in a Department of <br /> Transportation (DOT)-approved 55-gallon drum pending characterization and proper disposal <br /> 19976w rpt •• <br /> I FLUOR DANIEL GTI <br /> ' fry <br />