Laserfiche WebLink
_ _ II <br /> Site Background Information : Quick N Save # 1 <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br /> Utilizing a semi-logarithmic plot of ground water draw-down vs . observation well distance to <br /> pumping well (Jacob straight-line method), a best-fit line was utilized to project a radius of influence <br /> for EW-1 at approximately 29 . 8 feet at 1 .0 GPM . Utilizing the Distance-Drawdown Method (Jacob <br /> straight-line method) for the first stage of the pump test ( 1 .0 GPM), a transmissivity was calculated <br /> at 10.6 ft2/day (equivalent to 79 . 1 gallons per day/ft) and a storativity value calculated at 0. 0012. <br /> For the second stage of the pump test (0.75 GPM), a transmissivity was calculated at 9 .4 ft'/day <br /> (equivalent to 70 gallons per day/ft) and a storativity value calculated at 0 .00031 (Appendix J). <br /> Based on transmissivity values of 10.6 ft2/day (first stage) and 9.4 ft2/day (second stage) and an <br /> aquifer thickness of 20 ft (screen interval at EW- 1 ), hydraulic conductivity values were calculated <br /> at 0.53 ft/day, or 1 .9 x 104 cm/s (first stage) and 0.47 ft/day, or 1 .7 x 104 cm/s (second stage) ; these <br /> hydraulic conductivities are consistent with a screened interval located within a silty fine sand. This <br /> suggests that although the pilot boring for EW- 1 encountered some coarser grained sand, the fine <br /> silty sand encountered between 30 and 55 feet bsg in previous pilot borings for MW- 1 through MW- <br /> 4 is more characteristic ofthe aquifer (see the AGE-prepared Quarterly Report - First Quarter 2004, <br /> dated 15 June 2004) . <br /> Laboratory analysis of extracted water during the pumping test detected elevated concentrations of <br /> TPH-g, BTEX, MTBE, and 1 ,2-DCA in both samples submitted for analysis. Concentrations were <br /> as high as 61 ,000 pg/1 TPH-g, 9,900 µg/I benzene, 23 ,000 µg/I toluene, 2, 500 gg/l ethylbenzene, <br /> 18,200 Itg/l xylenes, 220 µg/I MTBE, and 230 pg/l 1 ,2-DCA. All concentrations detected were <br /> significantly above the respective MCLS for each contaminant. <br /> SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION PILOT TEST <br /> On 23 August 2005 , a SVE pilot test was conducted at the site. The pilot test operated for <br /> approximately 7 hours and was terminated due to stabalization. An induced vacuum potential was <br /> applied to the casing of vapor well VW-3 . The vacuum-induced pressure reduction was monitored <br /> at surrounding observation points (VW- 1 , VW-2, VW-4, and MW-2) with air-tight well caps pre- <br /> connected with Magnehelic vacuum gauges fitted to each observation well . A sample port was <br /> tapped into the PVC near the wellhead and a portable organic vapor meter equipped with a photo- <br /> ionization detector (PID : Microtip model 1000 calibrated to isobutylene) was used to measure <br /> organic vapor (OV) concentrations. The organic vapor concentrations, the induced vacuum potential <br /> atthe observation points, extracted soil gas flow rate, and revolutions per minute (RPM) of the SVE <br /> unit were measured at 0 .5-hour intervals and logged on field sheets . The SVE unit was operated at <br /> approximately 2,500 RPMs for the eight-hour test, with a flow rate measured between 30 scfm <br /> (standard cubic feet per minute) and 36 scfm. OV readings ranged from 1158 to 1401 ppm. Induced <br /> vacuum measured at the extraction well (VW-3) was a constant 94 inches of water. Based upon an <br /> effective vacuum potential of 0 . 1 inches of water, the calculated effective radius of influence of SVE <br /> at the site will be approximately 28 feet. <br /> TPH-g was detected in the soil gas/vapor samples at concentrations ranging from 8,700 µg/1 to <br /> AAvaneed GeoEnvironmental, Inc. <br />