SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE

Home Browse Search

� DIP. B initemE;Stacelnycs I LTCP Checklist - © GEOTRACI(ER HOME I MANAGE PROJECTS I REPORTS I SEARCH I LCGOUT MCBILLIN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT (T10000002615) - MAP THIS SITE OPEN- SREASSESSMENI 2154 SOUTH EL DORADO STREET ACTIVITIES REPORT CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES STOCKTON , CA 95206 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LOP DEAD/ - CASEIP 1910 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC WEBPAGE CASEWORRER: VICNIMCCAR - SUPERWSOR: ADRIENNEELLSAESSER VIEW PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY FOR THIS SITE CENTRAL VALLEY RMCB (REGION 5S) - CASE#: 391154 CASEWORKER: JAMES BA SUPERVISOR: CORI CONDON CUFinaimll: 197B5, 110120 CUFPriarity Assigned: B CLEF Amount Paid; $16 THIS PROJECT WAS.IAST MODIFIED BY NUEL HENOERSONON 6/14201410:04:50 AM - HiSIQ 21_Y THIS SITE HAS SUBMn ALS. CLICK HERE TO OPEN A NEW WINDOW WITH THE SUBMITTAL APPROVAL PAGE FOR THIS SIDE. CLOSURE POLICY THIS VERSION IS FINAL AS OF 6/1912014 CHECXLtST1AfgQATEOON711f/2013E POLICY HISTORY General Criteria - The site safisfies the policy general criteria - CLEAR SECTION ANSWERS NO a. Is the unauthorized release located within the service area of a public waters stem? Nameof Water System : JUALWATER rYES r NO b. The unauthorized release consists only of petroleumiL121201 r' YES r NO c. The unauthorized ("primary') release from the UST system has been stopped. is YES r NO d. Free product has been removed to the maximum extent practicable "info . r FP Not Encountered r' YES r NO e. A conceptual silo model that assesses the nature extent, and mobility of the release has been developed 1in�. Description (Check all Nat Apply): r GW Not Evaluated F Groundwater Assessment Incomplete - Areal Extent of Contamination Not Defined F Groundwater Assessment Incomplete - Depth a Contamination Not Defined C Hydrogeology Not Adequately Banned r YES r NO (✓ Potential Receptors Not Identified r Soil Assessment Incomplete - Areal Extent Not Defined F Soil Assessment Incomplete - Depth Unknown F Sail Vapor Not Evaluated C an., - f. Secondary source has been removed to the extent eradicable fnk1. I diment to Removing Secondary Source (Check all that Apply): I✓ Sensualism Has Not Been Attempted r Remediation Was Designed Incorrectly r YES r NO F_ Remediation Was Shia ON Prematurely r Poor Recantation OAM F_ Other - g. Soil or groundwater has been tested for MTBE and results reported in accordance with Health and Safely Code Section r Not Required r' r 25296.15. quir VES NO h. Does a nuisance exist, as defined by Water Cade section 13050. r YES r NO 1 . Media-Specific Criteria: Groundwater - The contaminant plume that exceeds waterquality objectives is stable ordecreasingin areal extent, and NO meets all of the additional characteristics of one of the five classes of sites listed below. - CLEAR SECTION ANSWERS EXEMPTION - Soil Only Case (Release has ILI Affected Groundwater - Info) r YES r NO Does the site meet any of the Groundwater specific criteria scenarios? r YES r' NO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS - Please indicate only those conditions that do not meet the policy criteria: Plume Length (That Exceeds Water Quality Objectives) : r z 100 Feel and <250 Feet r z 250 Feel and < 1 ,000 Feet r z 1,000 Feet r Unknown Plume is Stable or Decreasing in AREAL Extent : r' No r' Unknown Free Product in Groundwater ; r Yes r No r Unknown Free Product Has Been Removed to the Maximum Extent Practicable : C No r Unknown For sites with free product, the Plume Has Been Stable or Decreasing for 5-Years (info) : C No r Unknown For sites with free product, owner Willing to Accept a Land Use Restriction (if required) r' No r Unknown Free Product Extends Offsite : C' Yes r Unknown Benzene Concentration : r z 1 ,000 pyl and < 3,000 pg/I r z 3,000 pgn r Unknown MTBE Concentration : r z 1 ,000 pg/I r Unknown Nearest Supply Well (From Plume Boundary) : r s 250 Feet r > 250 Feel and z 1 ,000 Feet r Unknown Nearest Surface Water Body (From Plume Boundary) : https://geotracker.waterboards.ca. gov/regulators/screens/closure_folicy.asp?global_id=T1 - - . 6/19/2014