Laserfiche WebLink
GeologkOf 7CCWCS 11M Page 3 <br /> Interim Remedial Action Plan <br /> ..r <br /> Project No.723.2 <br /> March 7,2005 <br /> b� <br /> vacuum could be achieved at a distance of.46 feet from the extraction point (from EW-1 <br /> to MW-5). '--' r <br /> 2) GTI estimated that approximately 485 lbs. or 173 gallons of petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> were removed by vapor extraction during the week long test. This amount includes <br /> hydrocarbons removed from groundwater during the liquid ring pump separation process. <br /> As shown in Table 2, the liquid ring pump vapor/liquid separation process reduces the <br /> contaminant concentrations in the extracted groundwater. The groundwater samples <br /> taken after the liquid ring pump on the treatment trailer show an order of magnitude <br /> reduction for BTEX and TPH-G constituents. <br /> 3) A sustained pumping rate of.3 gpm was achieved in well EW-1 for several days. This <br /> well demonstrates that the site's soils are conducive to groundwater extraction <br /> technology. If the pumping was continued then the drawdown would produce a cone of <br /> depression further exposing soil to be influenced by vapor extraction. <br /> 4) The amount of contamination removed by groundwater extraction during the test is <br /> estimated to be approximately 16.06 lbs. or 5.71-,gallons of petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> 5) Wells VEW-1 & VEW-2 were completed with 20 feet of screen below the water table. <br /> These wells could be utilized in conjunction with well EW-1 for additional groundwater <br /> extraction capacity as well as vapor extraction. <br /> 6) The current well configuration should be adequate to support a remedial design plan to <br /> address the residual contamination in soils and shallow groundwater at the site. <br /> However, the contamination present in off site, down-gradient well MW-208 indicates <br /> that the aquifer is impacted in its screened level of 76 feet bgs (or approximately 39 feet <br /> below the water table). An additional groundwater extraction well would be needed to <br /> remove water from this depth as no on site well intercepts this interval. <br /> 7) The five foot sampling methodology utilized at this site may have failed to intercept <br /> lithologic units of greater hydraulic conductivity. In addition, the plume remains <br /> undefined down gradient of the MW-8/-108/-208 well cluster. Additional site <br /> characterization is needed to develop a full scale groundwater remedial system. <br /> Field evidence recorded during borehole installation indicates that contamination is present <br /> on the adjacent property across N. El Dorado Street — an active Shell service station. The <br /> data suggest that a co-mingled plume situation may exist and GTI recommends that the SJC <br /> PHS/EHD files be reviewed for the adjacent site to obtain well construction information and <br /> historical contaminant data. The file review will help clarify the site conceptual model. <br /> Because the lateral extent of the plume down gradient of the MW-8/108/208 well cluster has <br /> not been defined as noted in 7) above, the SJC PHS/EHD will probably require additional site <br /> definition. <br /> But concurrent with planning and executing additional site characterization, GTI <br /> recommends that interim remediation be implemented before this plume migrates any further <br /> and the cost for cleanup continues to increase. Interim remedial action can be initiated by <br /> installing a high vacuum dual phase extraction unit (as utilized during the pilot test) to <br /> address the on site contamination. Extraction should be performed on the existing wells EW- <br /> 1, VEW-1 & VEW-2 and a new extraction well set at a deeper depth (EW-2). The treatment <br /> system should include air stripping and granular activated carbon filtration of extracted <br />