Laserfiche WebLink
Geological TechAta Inc Page 4 <br /> Groundwater Monitonng Report <br /> Pioject No 723 2 <br /> Apri] t 8,2003 <br /> E <br /> Oxygenated Fuel Compounds (MTBE, DIPE, ETBE, TAME & TBA) by method 8260 <br /> ' The detection lit-nits for the above analyses are listed in Table 2 of Appendix A, while the <br /> lab analytical results are presented in Appendix B <br /> ' As required under AB2886, groundwater elevation and laboratory data were submitted <br /> electronically to GeoTracker on March 25 & April 16, 2003 - confirmation numbers <br /> ' 9218912303 & 6045791447 <br /> ' 2.0 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION <br /> The results of the groundwater sample analysis show the following <br /> • Review of the historic groundwater elevations show that groundwater levels raised each <br /> season from the mid 1990s to spring 2000 and have been decreasing steadily with each <br /> seasonal cycle since spring 2000 <br /> ' • The concentrations of BTEX and TPH-G continue to fluctuate in individual monitoring <br /> wells from one sampling event to the next <br /> • Intermediate well MW-101 continues to contain stable TPH-G concentrations, but <br /> benzene and toluene concentrations continue to fluctuate at levels dust above the <br /> laboratory reporting limits <br /> ' • Deep well MW-201 contained xylene at a concentration (0 5 ug/l) dust above the <br /> laboratory reporting limit The previously noted contamination is probably a drilling <br /> artifact created by the use of mud rotary drilling It is noted that the contaminant <br /> ' concentrations in MW-201 have declined by an order of magnitude since the first <br /> monitoring event in December 2001, which supports the conclusion that the high <br /> concentrations were from a drilling artifact <br /> ' • Figure 4 illustrates TPH-G and Benzene concentrations versus elevation in well MW-3, <br /> which lies near the core of the plume There appears to be a direct relationship between <br /> ' the water table and the TPH-G concentrations Benzene concentrations have stabilized <br /> in the well <br /> • Figure 5 illustrates TPH-G and Benzene concentrations versus elevation in well MW-4, <br /> ' which lies up gradient of the core of the plume The contaminant concentrations have <br /> stabilized in this well <br /> • Figure 6 illustrates TPH-G and Benzene concentrations versus elevation in deep well <br /> MW-101, which lies near the core of the plume The concentrations are approaching <br /> stability The steep decline in the initial concentrations suggests that the contaminants <br /> detected in the well were initially a drilling artifact The continued presence of the <br /> TPH-G suggests that this well is within the plume <br /> 1 <br />