Laserfiche WebLink
�1 M1 <br /> ciulkogicaITechnics Inc. Page 5 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No. 723.2 <br /> j f March 10, 2003 <br /> stability. The steep decline in the initial concentrations suggests that the contaminants <br /> detected in the well were initially a drilling artifact. The continued presence of the <br /> TPH-G suggests that this well is within the plume. <br /> • Figure 7 illustrates the TPH-G concentrations contours in the shallow wells. The high <br /> concentration in well MW-3 creates a localized node. Additional site investigation will <br /> allow a more accurate site conceptual model. <br /> a 3.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 3 <br /> a Conclusions <br /> I. Groundwater flow trends to the northeast to east. The southerly flow direction recorded <br /> on December 4, 2000, appears to be anomalous. <br /> 2. It is noted that the groundwater elevation exceeded the level of the well screens. <br /> 3. High levels of BTEX and TPH-G are present in the groundwater of all six water table 4 <br /> monitoring wells. Low concentrations of BTEX and TPH-G are usually present in both 1 <br /> �I of the deeper wells. Generally, most of the wells show stable levels of contaminant <br /> concentrations over time. l <br /> r 4. The groundwater contaminant plume is not defined vertically or laterally. However, the <br /> decreasing concentration of contaminants in MW-201 suggests that this well may define <br /> the vertical edge of the plume in this location. <br /> 5. Oxidation-Reduction Potential and Dissolved Oxygen measurements (Table 4) show <br /> that all eight wells are screened in areas of the groundwater plume that are affected by <br /> .the biodegradation reactions occurring within the plume. The highly negative ORP <br /> values indicate that the wells are within the halo of reaction depleted water caused by <br /> biodegradation of the contaminants. This suggests that the contaminant plume is stable <br /> and that natural attenuation processes are near a stand still, which corroborates well with <br /> the laboratory data. <br /> p Recommendations i <br /> ' 1. In July 27, 2002, we submitted a work plan for additional site characterization, with <br /> subsequent addendums. The San Joaquin County HS/EHD has approved the <br /> installation of three multi-chamber wells and these will be installed pending USTCFP <br /> cost pre-approval. <br /> 2. Continue quarterly groundwater monitoring, with the next monitoring event scheduled a <br /> in March 2003. <br /> 3. We recommend that interim remediation be considered before this plume migrates any <br /> further and the cost for cleanup continues to increase. <br />