Laserfiche WebLink
Geolog£eal 7-eek1da kc Page 5 <br />' Groundwater Momtormg Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> December 17,2002 <br /> ' 3.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> ' Conclusions <br /> 1 Groundwater flow trends to the northe east The southerly flow direction recorded <br /> on December 4, 2000, appears to b anomalous <br /> 2 It is noted that the groundwater elevation exceeded the level of the well screens <br /> 3 High levels of BTEX and TPH-G are present in the groundwater of all six water table <br /> monitoring wells Low concentrations of BTEX and TPH-G are present in both of the <br /> deeper wells Generally, most of the wells show stable levels of contaminant <br /> concentrations over time <br /> 4 The groundwater contaminant plume is not defined vertically or laterally However, the <br /> decreasing concentration of contaminants in MW-201 suggests that this well may define <br /> the vertical edge of the plume in this location <br /> 5 Oxidation-Reduction Potential and Dissolved Oxygen measurements (Table 4) shows <br /> that all eight wells are screened in areas of the groundwater plume that are affected by <br /> the biodegradation reactions occurring within the plume The highly negative ORP <br /> values and the low DO content indicates that the wells are within the halo of reaction <br /> depleted water caused by biodegradation of the contaminants This suggests that the <br /> contaminant plume is stable and that natural attenuation processes are near a stand still, <br /> which corroborates well with the laboratory data <br /> Recommendations <br /> 1 GTI has submitted our July 27, 2002 "Additional Site Characterization Work Plan" with <br /> subsequent addendums The San Joaquin County PHS/EHD has approved the <br /> installation of three multi-chamber wells and these will be installed pending USTCFP <br /> cost pre-approval <br /> 2 Continue quarterly groundwater monitoring, with the next monitoring event scheduled <br /> ' in December 2002 <br /> 4.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> This report was prepared in accordance with the accepted standards and practices of the <br /> field of environmental geology, groundwater hydrology and good business practices It <br /> should be recognized that definition and evaluation of environmental conditions is a <br /> difficult and inexact science Judgments leading to conclusions and recommendations are <br /> generally made with an incomplete knowledge of the site-specific conditions present <br />