Laserfiche WebLink
GeologxoI eclutics Inc Page 2 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> November 7,2001 <br /> Figure 2 is a groundwater gradient map for the September 12, 2001 event Figure 3, <br /> ' Groundwater Gradient Rose Diagram includes historical groundwater directions and <br /> gradients <br /> ' This is the eighth event during which the deep discretely screened well, MW-101, was <br /> monitored A shallow well has not yet been installed next to MW-101 so a vertical gradient <br /> cannot easily be calculated The groundwater head in MW-101 was less (0 18 — 0 52 feet) <br /> ' than the head in nearby wells MW-2 and MW-3, so it appears there may have been a <br /> significant vertical gradient on September, 2001 <br /> ' Table 1 in Appendix A contains the groundwater elevations and gradients for the site <br /> ' 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On September 12, 2001, Dei-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel arrived on-site, opened <br /> ' the wells, and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The <br /> water level readings were recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 foot In wells where free-floating <br /> product was suspected, a clear disposable bailer is used to gauge the interface During this <br /> Nmonitoring no free product was noted <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a Waterra pump as recorded in the field <br /> ' logs (Appendix C) The rate of well purging was monitored The wells were purged of <br /> approximately three casing volumes and until the groundwater parameters (temperature, <br /> conductivity, and pH) had stabilized (Appendix C) indicating that water, representative of <br /> ' actual aquifer conditions, was entering the well Groundwater parameter stabilization was <br /> characterized by three successive readings within 10% <br /> ' Before a sample was collected, the well's water level was allowed to recharge to at least <br /> 80% of the initial level All water removed from the monitoring well and not used as a <br /> sample, was placed in a 55-gallon DOT (Department of Transportation 17-H) approved <br /> ' container that is properly labeled and temporarily stored on-site <br /> ' The dedicated Waterra pump was used to collect each monitoring well sample Extreme <br /> care was exercised while transferring the sample into 40-m1 VOA vials preserved with <br /> hydrochloric acid All samples were checked for headspace bubbles, labeled, inserted into <br /> ' foam holders and placed in an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br /> The sampling technician wore disposable gloves while collecting all samples <br /> ' A chain of custody document, listing all samples collected and their intended analyses, <br /> accompanied the samples from field to the laboratory, thereby providing a means to track <br /> their movement and ensure their integrity <br />