Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 <br /> ea{p u.1Tath-5Inc <br /> Site haratca,t c Motors) rl staff <br /> valentine 1 323 2Motars) effort) <br /> gr03ey v (day of the drilling ling efforts Mx <br /> Novns�bev3fl,2Doi on that day same <br /> completc the well installation <br /> and abando i gdrilling was extre dee <br /> 5 5 hours) to free drill from beveen <br /> hole was fin15hed later that nig erentiating <br /> lamed that this would 1 ecessrtate free dri in <br /> exp until 8 00 P M 1n diff 155 feet bgs <br /> Wong agreed ands om 7 30 P � The driller had difficulty h the 128 <br /> slow and it took feet) thraug ected that the <br /> 155 feet bgs (27 (silts based on resistance <br /> I"ud, it is cusp er depths <br /> bgs to through sand versus clay resent in shallow October <br /> drilling aced on an exarniriation of the reeircuntervals as p <br /> interval B sand and silticlay <br /> fined alternating grouting did not occur until the fallowing ay 8 <br /> interval contained lacei�ient and gro while drilling at the l0 <br /> The actual well p apparent <br /> 25, 2001 and gasoline odor were not app 127 feet <br /> Hydrocarbon ntervg <br /> apparent �thtle drilling at the 122 <br /> 117 feet bgs a ed gasoal line) ware <br /> • Hydrocarbon odors g <br /> bgs interval ore information <br /> See Appendix B, Boring Logs for iXi <br /> ��Np,p,,TI4NS <br /> USIONS AND RECO this subsurface <br /> I 4.0 COfiICL collected over the course of <br /> of the data ns These conclusionstat ve of actual the <br /> aux interpretation several conclusions are representative <br /> Based on although incomplete, which would upon <br /> iti <br /> investigation, GTI Haver considered, <br /> e that the data we e that there may be u ilius our concluaons s, <br /> premise e acknowledg retatton and the state and <br /> conditions W change Our iriterp on <br /> their consideration, our <br /> knowledge of site conditions, and <br /> Our Ire <br /> are based atrve technology <br /> limitations of subsurface investigative this investigation <br /> 4.1 Conclusions attons and the <br /> d roundwatet iiivestig <br /> ri into consideration the data obtained from <br /> Weal l ech lies <br /> II-,c , talo g Tevious sod an g conclusions <br /> Geolog data compiled during p makes the fallowing th of <br /> and from the asiitaring events, <br /> re alar groundwater m round ,ater plume has reachedobtairp►ed at <br /> g that the sand same <br /> nize the possibility bottom It is noted that shallower <br /> The inveStigatiori reveal rec0 sA11 an ,from the es that contained minor <br /> l T Howevc , bor <br /> 127 feet bgs have flowed into the pear of native soil sampl ration <br /> this depth ,lay 117 feet bgs appear to be inig <br /> samples at 111 and ear to be inhibiting <br /> contamination also prirriarily clayey,but this does not app <br /> The <br /> site geology plumes roundwater plumes are not defined iii any <br /> 2 T groundwater <br /> of the soil ai <br /> 3 At this time the lateral extent of the soil an <br /> direction <br /> endatlons the conclusions <br /> 4,2 gcC°nim recommendations based on <br /> Geologieal Technics <br /> Inc makes the follownlg <br /> 1 outlined above <br />