My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009276
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
2315
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544690
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009276
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2019 1:12:56 PM
Creation date
7/24/2019 11:52:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009276
RECORD_ID
PR0544690
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005839
FACILITY_NAME
CASTLE AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR INC.
STREET_NUMBER
2315
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12510017
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2315 N EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GeoCagxc Technm,Inc Page 2 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> August 20,2001 <br /> of groundwater under the site was 18 33 feet below mean sea level Depths to water ranged <br /> from 28 28 —29 11 feet bgs <br /> ' Figure 2 is a groundwater gradient snap for the June 25, 2001 event Figure 3, Groundwater <br /> Gradient Rose Diagram includes historical groundwater direction and gradients <br /> ' This is the seventh event during which the deep discretely screened well, MW-101, was <br /> monitored A shallow well has not yet been installed next to MW-101 so a vertical gradient <br /> cannot easily be calculated The groundwater head in MW-101 was less (-0 2 feet) than the <br /> head in nearby wells MW-2 and MW-3 so it appears there may have been a significant <br /> ' vertical gradient on June 25, 2001 <br /> Table 1 in Appendix A contains the groundwater elevations and gradients for the site <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> ' On June 25, 2001, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel arrived on-site, opened the <br /> wells, and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The <br /> water level readings were recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 foot In wells where free-floating <br /> product was suspected, a clear disposable bailer is used to gauge the interface During this <br /> monitoring no free product was noted <br /> ' Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a Waterra pump as recorded in the field <br /> logs (Appendix Q The rate of well purging was monitored The wells were purged of <br /> ' approximately three casing volumes and until the groundwater parameters (temperature, <br /> conductivity, and pH) had stabilized (Appendix C) indicating that water, representative of <br /> actual aquifer conditions, was entering the well Groundwater parameter stabilization was <br /> ' characterized by three successive readings within 10% <br /> Before a sample was collected, the well's water level was allowed to recharge to at least <br /> 80% of the initial level All water removed from the monitoring well and not used as a <br /> sample, was placed in a 55-gallon DOT (Department of Transportation 17-H) approved <br /> container that is properly labeled and temporally stored on-site <br /> ' The dedicated Waterra pump was used to collect each monitoring well sample Extreme <br /> care was exercised while transferring the sample into 40-m1 VOA vials preserved with <br /> ' hydrochloric acid All samples were checked for headspace bubbles, labeled, inserted into <br /> foam holders and placed in an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br /> The sampling technician wore disposable gloves while collecting all samples <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.