Laserfiche WebLink
' GoIogcalTclntcl�uPage <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> October 29,2004 <br /> ' 3 We recommend that interim remediation be considered before this plume migrates any <br /> further and the cost for cleanup continues to increase A feasibility study work plan for <br /> dual phase soil vapor and groundwater extraction was previously submitted to SJC <br /> PHS/EHD GTI's September 8, 2003 "Feasibility Study Work Plan - Dual Phase Soil <br /> Vapor and Groundwater Extraction Pilot Test" was approved by SJC PHS/EHD in their <br /> ' November 15, 2003 The pilot test was performed in late July 2004 <br /> 4 The SJC/EHD records for the adjacent Shell gas station should be reviewed to determine <br /> the degree of co-mingling of the plumes beneath the subject and adjacent Shell Oil sites <br /> ' Mr Jeff Wong of the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (SJC/EHD) <br /> supplied GTI staff with a copy of a July, 2003 groundwater monitoring report for the <br /> Shell Service Station facility across N El Dorado Street The report indicates that the <br /> ' wells on the northern portion of the Shell site contain low levels of TPH-G (110 - 2,500 <br /> ug/1) Since these monitoring wells are 50 feet deep, it is likely that the subject plume is <br /> ' diluted in these wells and mixing with shallower clean water The CMTrm well MW-108 <br /> is screened (4") at 52 feet bgs and it contains 6,010-ug/1 TPH-G The Shell site report <br /> also indicates that the two wells in the southern portion of the site (near the existing <br /> USTs) have MTBE above the laboratory detection limits The two northern wells that lie <br /> along the subject site plume axis do not contain MTBE above the laboratory reporting <br /> linut (0 5 ug/1) This suggests that the Shell facility has an MTBE problem not related to <br /> the subject site Further delineation of the plume in this area may be warranted <br /> 4.0 LEMaTATI®NS <br /> This report was prepared in accordance with the generally accepted standard of care and <br /> ' practice in effect at the time Services were rendered It should be recognized that definition <br /> and evaluation of environmental conditions is an inexact science and that the state or practice <br /> of environmental geology/hydrology is changing and evolving and that standards existing at <br /> ' the present time may change as knowledge increases and the state of the practice continues to <br /> improve Further, that differing subsurface soil characteristics can be experienced within a <br /> small distance and therefore cannot be known in an absolute sense All conclusions and <br /> ' recommendations are based on the available data and information. <br /> ' The tasks proposed and completed during this project were reviewed and approved by the <br /> local regulatory agency for compliance with the law No warranty, expressed or implied, is <br /> made <br />