Laserfiche WebLink
",041Cal rat A cs IAC Page 9 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> August 31,2004 <br /> ' Recommendations <br /> ' 1 Continue quarterly groundwater monitoring <br /> 2 On November 20 - 26, 2003, three multi-chamber wells were installed at the site Each <br /> well has a maximum of four intervals that can be sampled The deepest interval (MW- <br /> 308) in CMTTM well MW-8/108/108/308 should be sampled to determine the vertical <br /> limit of the plume in the down gradient direction This action has been scheduled for the <br /> ' third quarter of 2004 <br /> 3 The lateral extent of the groundwater plume is undefined down gradient of CMTrM well <br /> MW-81108/108/308 A limited site investigation should take place to define the down <br /> ' gradient extent of the plume This should consist of direct push probe drilling methods <br /> such as CPTTM to collect discrete groundwater samples rather than installing additional <br /> monitoring wells <br /> ' 4 We recommend that interim remediation be considered before this plume migrates any <br /> further and the cost for cleanup continues to increase A feasibility study work plan for <br /> dual phase soil vapor and groundwater extraction was previously submitted to SJC <br /> ' PHS/EHD GTI's September 8, 2003 "Feasibility Study Work Plan - Dual Phase Soil <br /> Vapor and Groundwater Extraction Pilot Test" was approved by SJC PHS/EHD in their <br /> November 15, 2003 The pilot test was performed in late July 2004 <br /> 5 The SJC/EHD records for the adjacent Shell gas station should be reviewed to determine <br /> the degree of co-mingling of the plumes beneath the subject and adjacent Shell Oil sites <br /> Mr Jeff Wong of the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (SJC/EHD) <br />' supplied GTI staff with a copy of a July, 2003 groundwater monitoring report for the <br /> Shell Service Station facility across N El Dorado Street The report indicates that the <br /> wells on the northern portion of the Shell site contain low levels of TPH-G (110 - 2,500 <br />' ugA) Since these monitoring wells are 50 feet deep, it is likely that the subject plume is <br /> diluted in these wells and mixing with shallower clean water The CMTTM well MW-108 <br /> is screened (4") at 52 feet bgs and it contains 6,010 ug/l TPH-G <br />' The Shell site report also indicates that the two wells in the southern portion of the site <br /> (near the existing USTs) have MTBE above the laboratory detection limits The two <br />' northern wells that lie along the subject site plume axis do not contain MTBE above the <br /> laboratory reporting limit (0 5 ug/1) This suggests that the Shell facility has an MTBE <br /> problem not related to the subject site <br /> 4.0 LINHTATIONS <br /> This report was prepared in accordance with the generally accepted standard of care and <br /> practice in effect at the time Services were rendered It should be recognized that definition <br /> and evaluation of environmental conditions is an inexact science and that the state or practice <br /> of environmental geology/hydrology is changing and evolving and that standards existing at <br /> the present time may change as knowledge increases and the state of the practice continues to <br />