Laserfiche WebLink
Geo41(cal7eCAN Cs Ifm Page 4 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> August 31,2004 <br /> ' 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> ' On May 6, 2004, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel arrived on-site, opened the wells <br /> and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The water level <br /> ' readings were recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 feet In wells where free-floating product is <br /> suspected, a clear disposable bailer is used to gauge the interface During this monitoring no <br /> free product was noted (this procedure is not exercised in the CMTrm wells due to their <br /> limited diameter) <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a Waterra pump as recorded in the field <br /> ' logs (Appendix C) The rate of well purging was monitored The wells were purged of <br /> approximately three casing volumes and until the groundwater parameters (temperature, <br /> conductivity and pH) had stabilized (Appendix C) indicating that water representative of <br /> actual aquifer conditions was entering the well Groundwater parameter stabilization was <br /> characterized by three successive readings within 10% <br /> Before a sample was collected, the welI's water level was allowed to recharge to at least 80% <br /> of the initial level The purge water was placed in a properly labeled 55-gallon DOT <br /> (Department of Transportation 17-1-1) approved container and temporarily stored on-site <br /> The dedicated Waterra pump was used to collect each monitoring well sample Extreme care <br /> was exercised while transferring the sample into 40-m1 VOA vials preserved with <br /> hydrochloric acid All samples were checked for headspace bubbles, labeled, inserted into <br /> foam holders and placed into an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br />' The sampling technician wore disposable gloves while collecting all samples <br /> A chain of custody document, listing all samples collected and their intended analyses, <br /> accompanied the samples from the field to the laboratory, thereby providing a means to track <br /> the movement of the samples and ensure their integrity <br />' 1.3 Laboratory Analyses <br />' The groundwater samples collected on May 6, 2004, were delivered to Sherwood Labs of <br /> Hilmar, California (certification#1400) for analyses of <br /> ❑ Benzene, Toluene,Ethyl Benzene, and Xylene (BTEX), MTBE, by EPA method 8020 <br /> ❑ Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA method 5030/8015(M) <br /> The detection limits for the above analyses are listed in Table 2 of Appendix A, while the lab <br /> analytical results are presented in Appendix B <br /> Note The data in Table 2 reflect GTI's opinion that the samples for MW-108 and MW-208 <br /> were swapped in the field This is probable as the deeper MW-208 sample had a higher <br />