My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009288
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
2315
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544690
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009288
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2019 1:15:46 PM
Creation date
7/24/2019 11:57:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009288
RECORD_ID
PR0544690
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005839
FACILITY_NAME
CASTLE AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR INC.
STREET_NUMBER
2315
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12510017
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2315 N EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> Geological Technics Inc Page 3 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> July 17, 2003 <br /> Vertical gradient calculation formulas are as follows <br /> • Vertical correction for gradient [(gw gradient slope) x (distance) = vertical correction] <br />' . Vertical head [(head of deep well) - (head of shallow + correction) = vertical head] <br /> • Vertical gradient [(vertical head) / (vertical distance) = vertical gradient] <br /> For the June 2003 event, the vertical gradient for the MW-3/MW-201 pair was negative (or <br /> downward) -0 006 ft/ft Previous calculations have revealed both positive and negative <br />' gradients but additional monitoring is needed to determine long term trends <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On June 20, 2003, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel arrived on-site, opened the <br /> wells and measui ed the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The <br /> water level readings were recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 feet In wells where free-floating <br /> product is suspected, a clear disposable bailer is used to gauge the interface During this <br /> monitoring no free product was noted <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a Waterra pump as recorded in the field <br /> logs (Appendix C) The rate of well purging was monitored The wells were purged of <br /> approximately three casing volumes and until the groundwater parameters (temperature, <br /> conductivity and pH) had stabilized (Appendix C) indicating that water representative of <br /> actual aquifer conditions was entering the well Groundwater parameter stabilization was <br /> characterized by three successive readings within 10% <br />' Before a sample was collected, the well's water level was allowed to recharge to at least <br /> 80% of the initial level The purge water was placed in a properly labeled 55-gallon DOT <br /> (Department of Transportation 17-H) approved container and temporarily stored on-site <br />' The dedicated Waterra pump was used to collect each monitoring well sample Extreme <br /> care was exercised while transferring the sample into 40-int VOA vials preserved with <br />' hydrochloric acid All samples were checked for headspace bubbles, labeled, inserted into <br /> foam holders and placed into an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br />' The sampling technician wore disposable gloves while collecting all samples <br /> A chain of custody document, listing all samples collected and their intended analyses, <br /> accompanied the samples from the field to the laboratory, thereby providing a means to <br /> track the movement of the samples and ensure their integrity <br /> i <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.