Laserfiche WebLink
' cwto kol Tedwa i= Page 4 <br /> g g <br /> Groundwater Momtonng Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> February 28,2005 <br /> ' For the October 2004 event, the vertical gradient for the MW-3/MW-201 pair was negative <br /> (or downward) at -0 002 ft/ft Previous calculations have revealed both positive and negative <br /> ' gradients but additional monitoring is needed to determine long-term trends <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On October 21, 2004, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel arrived on-site, opened the <br /> wells and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape The water <br /> ' level readings were recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 feet In wells where free-floating product <br /> is suspected, a clear disposable bailer is used to gauge the interface During this monitoring <br /> no free product was noted (this procedure is not exercised in the CMTrm wells due to their <br /> ' limited diameter) CM rm wells MW-7 &MW-8 were dry and not sampled <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a Waterra pump as recorded in the field <br /> ' logs (Appendix C) The rate of well purging was monitored The wells were purged of <br /> approximately three casing volumes and until the groundwater parameters (temperature, <br /> conductivity and pH) had stabilized (Appendix C) indicating that water representative of <br /> actual aquifer conditions was entering the well Groundwater parameter stabilization was <br /> characterized by three successive readings within 10% <br /> Before a sample was collected, the well's water level was allowed to recharge to at least 80% <br /> of the initial level The purge water was placed in a properly labeled 55-gallon DOT <br /> ' (Department of Transportation 17-H) approved container and temporarily stored on-site <br /> The dedicated Waterra pump was used to collect each monitoring well sample Care was <br /> t exercised while transferring the sample into 40-m1 VOA vials preserved with hydrochloric <br /> acid All samples were checked for headspace bubbles, labeled, inserted into foam holders <br /> and placed into an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br /> ' The sampling technician wore disposable gloves while collecting all samples <br /> ' A chain of custody document, listing all samples collected and their intended analyses, <br /> accompanied the samples from the field to the laboratory, thereby providing a means to track <br /> the movement of the samples and ensure their integrity <br /> 1.3 Laboratory Analyses <br /> ses <br /> ' The groundwater samples collected on October 21, 2004, were delivered to Sherwood Labs <br /> of Hilmar, California (certification#1400) for analyses of <br /> ' ❑ Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, and Xylene (BTEX), MTBE, by EPA method 8020 <br /> ❑ Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA method 5030/8015(M) <br /> 1 <br />