Laserfiche WebLink
G¢olagkj,Tech4laIu Page 12 <br /> Site Conceptual Model Report(2006 Revision) <br /> Valentine(Castle Motors) <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> June 16,2006 <br /> mass may continually decrease at a site while characterization progresses outward With <br /> sites where samples are collected over a long period of time, it is generally not possible to <br /> ' estimate how much concentrations have decreased in areas where samples were collected <br /> early in the investigation <br /> ' The contaminant plumes at the site consist of three phases 1) adsorbed to the soil particles, <br /> 2) dissolved in the groundwater and 3) vapor in the pore spaces of the soil Of these, the bulk <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbons will generally be adsorbed to soil particles Groundwater plume <br /> dimensions are defined by quarterly sampling of the monitoring wells at the site It is <br /> extremely difficult to characterize the mass of soil gas at a site and it is generally not done <br /> 2.6.1 Soil Contaminant Mass Estimate Calculations <br /> GTI completed soil mass balance calculations for the site in our January 21, 2004 "Additional <br /> Site Characterization Report, Soil and Groundwater Investigation" SCM Those <br /> calculations are reiterated herein since the extent of the soil plume was defined at that point <br /> The mass of contaminant in the soil was determined by calculating the volume of each soil <br /> ' zone- shallow & deep as shown in Figures 10 and 11 The volume of each zone was <br /> multiplied by soil bulk density values from literature to obtain the pounds of soil in each <br /> zone The pounds of soil, in each zone, is then converted to kilograms and then multiplied by <br /> Mthe contaminant load <br /> The historical soil data was then used to calculate the contaminant load in the shallow and <br /> ' deep zones For the shallow zone, the soil samples' TPH-G values in borehole SB-B were <br /> averaged within the vertical profile to compute a value for the zone A value of one-half the <br /> detection limit was used for non-detect samples (0 5 mg/kg) For the deep zone, the soil <br /> ' samples' TPH-G values in boreholes SB-B, and MW-1 through MW-6 were averaged within <br /> the vertical profile to compute a value for the borehole The average borehole values were <br /> then used to complete the contour map presented in Figure 11 The average (median) values <br /> ' between the contours (i e - 500 mg/kg, 1500 mg/kg, etc ) were then used in Table 1, <br /> Appendix E, to approximate the mass of the zone intervals <br /> ' A mass balance of 11,545 kg (25,457 lbs or 4,106 gal) of TPH-G contamination in soil was <br /> calculated <br /> ' 2.6.2 Groundwater Contaminant Mass Estimate Calculations <br /> Figures 12, 13 and 14 illustrate the April 17, 2006 groundwater TPH-G plumes for the <br /> shallow, intermediate and deep aquifer horizons, respectively The total mass of TPH-G <br /> ' contaminant in the groundwater was determined by calculating the volume of each set of <br /> contaminant contour lines for each of the three aquifer horizons CAD software was used to <br /> determine the area within each contour line in Figures 12, 13 and 14 The volume of water <br /> within each contour interval was determined by multiplying the area of each contour by the <br /> vertical height of each aquifer horizon This volume was then multiplied by the porosity of <br /> the soil [from literature assume 45% for clay/silts, 30% for sands - Driscoll, 1989] to obtain <br />