Laserfiche WebLink
Ge0bg1cal rechAks lnr Page 9 <br />' Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> June 21,2006 <br /> displayed a decreasing trend until early 2004 and an increasing trend for the past two <br /> years The steep decline in the initial concentrations suggests that the contaminants <br /> I detected in the well were initially a drilling artifact The recent events suggest that the <br /> well intercepts the bottom of the plume <br /> o Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) and Dissolved Oxygen (DO) measurements <br /> (Table 7) show that most of the wells monitored are screened in areas of the <br /> groundwater plume that are affected by the biodegradation reactions occurring within <br /> the plume The low to highly negative ORP values indicate that the wells are within <br /> the halo of reaction depleted water caused by biodegradation of the contaminants <br /> The low DO values of the wells also reflected this condition Several of the CMTrm <br /> wells had unusually high ORP values (both positive and negative) suggesting a <br /> methodology problem in the field <br />' 3.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Conclusions <br /> 1 Groundwater flow trends northeast to east The southerly flow direction recorded on <br /> December 4, 2000, appears to be anomalous The deepest set of CMTrm wells displayed <br /> a groundwater mound in the vicinity of MW-101 with divergence to the northwest and <br /> northeast It appears the deepest groundwater level monitored experiences periodic <br /> reversals from the easterly directions exhibited in the shallower levels Additional data is <br /> needed before reaching any definitive conclusions <br /> 2 High levels of BTEX and TPH-G are present in the groundwater of all six on-site shallow <br /> and intermediate monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-6) <br /> 3 The main mass of contaminants has migrated to a depth of 45 to 70 ft bgs, indicating that <br /> the contaminants are mobile <br /> 4 Cross gradient deep well MW-207 has displayed an increase in contaminant <br /> concentrations since October 2004 (it was non-detect for TPH-G this event) This <br /> probably represents the edge of the advancing plume <br /> S Down gradient wells MW-8/108/208 contain moderate levels of TPH-G and BTEX as <br /> ' compared to the on-site wells <br /> 6 The groundwater contaminant plume was defined down gradient of the MW-8/108/208 <br /> well set with the advancement of the CPT borings in February 2006 <br /> ' 7 Well set MW-9/1091209 historically defines the lateral extent of the plume in an up <br /> gradient direction However, all three aquifer levels shallow, intermediate and deep <br /> ' (MW-9, MW-109 & MW-209) contained TPH-G during the three previous events The <br /> mechanism by which the contamination has mobilized up gradient may be related to a <br /> leaking water pipe on an adjacent sidewalk In late February 2006, a water leak was <br /> 1 noted on El Dorado Street next to the contamination site We notified the City water <br /> company (CWS) and requested that it be fixed ASAP A site inspection on March 9, <br /> 2006 noted that it had been fixed The influx of an unknown quantity of water onto the <br /> soil column may be responsible for spreading the contamination as evident by the new <br /> I <br />