My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
2320
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0519126
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2019 1:33:51 PM
Creation date
7/24/2019 1:15:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0519126
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0014313
FACILITY_NAME
SHELL FOOD MART
STREET_NUMBER
2320
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12521030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2320 N EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 1 <br /> 1 ti./ v <br /> Harlin Knoll [EH] <br /> From: Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 3:57 PM <br /> To: Harlin Knoll [EH] <br /> Subject: FW: Shell Station at 2320 N. EI Dorado Street <br /> Sorry Harlin, I though Mike had inherited this one. <br /> Nuel <br /> From: Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 2:52 PM <br /> To: 'Jim Barton' <br /> Cc: Mike Infurna [EH]; Adrienne Ellsaesser [EH] <br /> Subject: Shell Station at 2320 N. EI Dorado Street <br /> Jim, <br /> I'm thinking of closing the site at 2320 N. EI Dorado Street, Stockton, a Shell site. TPHg, BTEX and fuel oxys are <br /> generally delineated and at moderate to low concentrations. TPHg is highest in MW-1, and CRA estimates its <br /> return to"ESLs"in 12 years. Only benzene and xylenes in soil exceed ESLs for leaching, but CRA notes that GW <br /> impact demonstrates little active leaching. Impact in MWA and MW-2 is not inconsistent with being a part of the <br /> 2315 N. EI Dorado St site's plume, but CRA did not note this. <br /> CRA estimates dissolved mass at 1.35 pounds TPHg and 0.0044 pounds benzene; soil mass at 1.2 pounds TPHg <br /> and 0.004 pounds benzene. <br /> Problem with site for some time has been PCE and TCE in groundwater, mostly mW-1 and MW-2. Site had a <br /> waste oil tank pulled circa 1984, no record of its former location available. CRA noted that a cleaners on the site <br /> in 1960-1965 and state that this was the probable source of the PCE/TCE and it isn't Shell's problem. I checked <br /> out the Polk Directories at the library and found the business—Service Cleaners -listed under clothes cleaners at <br /> 2326 N/ EI Dorado Street from 1928 to 1960. For much of the 32 years the business was there I'd speculate they <br /> used Stoddard solvent or some such, but there is some time where PCE would be the likely chemical of choice, <br /> assuming cleaning on site was performed. CRA hints that the station was built circa 1975, taking up the entire <br /> east side of the 2300 block. <br /> PCE and TCE were present in MWA and MW-2 at concentrations of 44 ppb PCE and 210 ppb TCE in MWA and <br /> at 140 ppb PCE and 48 ppb TCE in MW-2 in January 2010. Both have been in the low to middle 100's of ppbs in <br /> the past. The down-gradient well MW-2 is generally the more impacted, so lateral extent is not demonstrated. <br /> The PCE and TCE in MW-2 is accompanied only by minor TPHg and occasional low 1,2-DCA. <br /> With the relatively short time period a waste oil tank was on the site compared to how long the cleaners was <br /> there, and the lack of significantly impacted soil encountered that could indicate a waste oil LIST release, and <br /> with the site ready for closure in all other respects, I am reluctant to try to get more down-gradient investigation. I <br /> can't prove it, but I think CRA has it right this time. I think we should close this site Jim. Let me know what you <br /> think. <br /> Nuel <br /> 12/20/2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.