Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Denis Brown v Page 2 of 3 <br /> 2320 N. EI Dorado St, Stockton, CA 10 December 2009 <br /> sample from MW-6 (maximum concentration was 0.041 mg/Kg 1,2-DCA). Groundwater sampled <br /> from the wells have either been 'non-detect' for the CDCs, or have had low concentrations of <br /> TPHg, MTBE, PCE and/or TCE. <br /> Additional soil and groundwater samples were collected from cone penetration testing (CPT) <br /> borings advanced in 2008; the soil samples were generally "non-detect" for CDCs, except for six <br /> soil samples collected from CPT-1 and/or CPT-2 at depths ranging between 35 feet bsg and 80 <br /> feet bsg; the samples were impacted by low concentrations of PCE and/or TCE. The <br /> concentrations of the detected compounds ranged from 0.0052 mg/Kg TCE to 0.016 mg/Kg <br /> PCE. Discreet grab groundwater samples collected from the CPT borings were variously <br /> impacted by TPHg, BTEX, TBA, 1,2-DCA, PCE and/or TCE. The most impacted grab <br /> groundwater sample collected was the 64-foot sample from CPT-3, which contained 16,000 <br /> micrograms per Liter (Ng/L) TPHg, 720 pg/L benzene, 120 pg/L toluene, 1,300 pg/L <br /> ethylbenzene, 269 pg/L total xylenes, 9.2 PCE and 41 pg/L TCE. The other grab groundwater <br /> samples, much less intensely impacted, variously contained TPHg, 1,2-DCA, PCE and TCE, but <br /> no detectable BTEX. <br /> CRA concluded that: <br /> • Impacted soil and groundwater has been sufficiently delineated laterally and vertically, <br /> • The dissolved plume was contracting areally and had declining concentrations of COCs; <br /> • MTBE is the only COC not delineated down-gradient of MW-5, but CRA states that <br /> additional assessment is not needed as the concentrations are declining in MW-5; <br /> • The high concentration of TPHg and BTEX encountered in the grab groundwater sample <br /> collected from CPT-3 at 64 feet bsg was part of the release from the 2315 N. EI Dorado <br /> Street site, <br /> • The PCE and TCE detected in groundwater samples and in soil samples collected <br /> beneath the water table were derived from a previous on-site dry cleaning operation and <br /> were not part of the UST release; previously CRA had attributed the PCE and TCE to <br /> release(s) on the 2315 N. EI Dorado Street site, <br /> • Additional site assessment was not necessary; <br /> • No active remediation of impacted groundwater or soil has been conducted; <br /> • There are no water supply wells within 1,200 feet of the site; <br /> • A risk assessment for the site has not been completed; <br /> • Analysis for PCE and TCE in groundwater samples should be discontinued; and <br /> • A site closure summary report should be prepared. <br /> Based on this review of the SCM and site data derived through previous investigations of the <br /> site, the EHD agrees that the plume of impacted soil has been adequately delineated, as has <br /> the dissolved TPHg plume, and that the BTEX chemicals are not significant CDCs for this site. <br /> The contaminant impact to the CPT-3 64-foot grab groundwater sample better fits the profile of <br /> the impact on the 2315 N. EI Dorado Street site than it does that of the subject site and may be <br /> related to the unauthorized release up-gradient of the subject site. <br /> The SCM presented by CRA, the COCs monitoring history on the subject site, and the unlikely <br /> potential for impacting a sensitive receptor in the foreseeable future leads the EHD to agree that <br /> SCM, QM, NFAR Comment Letter 1210 <br />