Laserfiche WebLink
._, TANK CL091RE REPORT <br /> 2320 North Et Dorado Street, <br /> Stockton, California <br /> -- Aegis Project No. 09.049 <br /> Page 6 <br /> 3.1 ,pre Tank Replacement site Assessment Results Report" summary <br /> Aegis submitted a "Pre-Tank Replacement Site Assessment Results <br /> Report" in March 1990. The scope of work and findings are summarized <br /> as follows: <br /> A total of fourteen soil borings were drilled adjacent to the former <br /> tank basin, in the vicinity of the product piping line near the <br /> dispensing islands and within the area of the proposed new tank <br /> location (Figure 2) . <br /> Results from laboratory analysis of soil samples obtained during the <br /> Pre-Tank Replacement Site Assessment indicated petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> were not present at detectable levels in soil samples collected from <br /> borings located near the underground storage tanks. Soil samples <br /> collected from borings nearest the product dispensing islands and <br /> within the proposed new tank location revealed detectable levels of <br /> toluene and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as diesel. TPH as <br /> gasoline and diesel were detected in soil samples collected from the <br /> borings near the product piping and dispensing islands. <br /> 3.2 Tank Closure <br /> Three underground storage tanks and associated product lines <br /> were removed under the direction of the SJCEHD. Prior to removal of <br /> tanks, backfill material above and surrounding the upper portion of <br /> the tanks was removed. The excavated soil was screened for the <br /> presence of organic vapors and segregated accordingly. The material <br /> was stockpiled in two separate areas. The piles were located on the <br /> northwest corner of the property and immediately east of the excavated <br /> tank location. Soil samples were collected during excavation <br /> according to Regional Water Quality Control Board Guidelines and <br /> SJCEHD requirements. <br /> The results of laboratory analyses of soil samples collected from both <br /> the former and new tank locations are summarized in Table 2. <br /> Laboratory reports and chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix <br /> A. Sampling and analyses were performed according to the methods <br /> presented in Appendix B. Sample identification numbers presented in <br /> Table 2 are referenced to the sample locations depicted in Figures 3 <br /> and 4. <br />