Laserfiche WebLink
,y <br /> f <br /> ' 10 September 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 04-1129 ` <br /> ' Page 3 of 7 li <br /> i <br /> [I <br /> 23 PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES <br /> Previous site assessments on the property include <br /> • February 2002 - A geotechnical investigation was conducted at the site by Raney <br /> Geotechnical Inc (RGI){During the course of the investigation, soil samples collected from <br /> tA' 4V ; two borings (B4 and B5)were noted as having a"gasoline odor" <br /> ry - May 2002-One soil boring(B-5)was advanced near the former UST area by Construction <br /> Testing & Engineering, Inc (CTE) to determine the nature and extent.of soil possibly <br /> ' Impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons Soil samples collected from soil boring B-5 contained <br /> concentrations of total;Ipetroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g), diesel <br /> ' (TPH-d)and/or motor oil(TPH-mo) The highest detected concentrations were found in soil I s <br /> samples collected at depths of 10 and 15 feet below surface grade (bsg), respectively, I <br /> however,additional laboratory analysis of the 15-f6ot sample from bonng B-5 did not detect <br /> ' volatile organic compounds (including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes <br /> [BTEX] and methyl tertiary-butyl ether [MTBE]) or polychlorinated biphenyls <br /> • Subsequently, a geophysical (magnetometer) survey of a portion of the site was performed <br /> to locate potential anomalies(underground storage tanks[USTs]or other buried structures) <br /> • .July 2002-Exploratory trenches were excavated near the UST area utilizing a backhoe and <br /> two soil probe borings (PB-2 and P13-3) were advanced.at the site, the trenches were <br /> excavated at locations identified during the magnetic survey as possible USTs or buried <br /> structures The eastern trench contained assorted waste material and excavated soil had a- <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon=like odor and appeared to be stained, soil samples from the soil <br /> borings did not contain detectable concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons at the depths <br /> sampled Petroleuin hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds were detected in.a grab <br /> iground water sample collected from soil boring PB-2 at concentrations of 270 micrograms ;I <br /> per liter (µg/l) TPH-g, 2 6 µg11 toluene, 2 3 µg/1 ethylbenzene, 27 6 pg/1 total xylenes, <br /> 3 7 pg/l napthalene„1 1 1:g/1 n-propylbenzene, 14µg/11,2,4-tnmethylbenzene,4 1 µg/l 1,3,5- <br /> tnmethylbenzene and i':2 µg/1 n-butylbenzene, however, the detected concentrations of I <br /> VOCs do not exceed th'e state of California Department of Health Services' Maximum <br /> I <br /> Contaminant Levels and Action Levels <br /> • November 2002 - Two 'USTs (UST-1 and UST-2) were discovered during excavation of <br /> debris and hydrocarbon-impacted soil The two USTs were single-walled and appeared to <br /> be constructed of redwood with steel banding, the tanks were contained in separate back <br /> vaults with concrete floors Each lank had an approximate capacity of 15,000 to 20,000 . <br /> gallons Upon discovery of the tanks, the San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department (EHD) was notified and the tanks were removed under permit Based on <br /> analytical results of soil samples collected from beneath the tanks, it appears that the tanks [ <br /> Advanced GeoEnveronmeatal,Inc <br />