Laserfiche WebLink
Icompounds(including benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene and total xylenes[BTEX] and methyl <br /> tertiary-butyl ether [MTBE]) or polychlorinated biphenyls <br />' Subsequently, a geophysical (magnetometer) survey of a portion of the site was performed <br /> to locate potential anomalies(underground storage tanks[USTs] or other buried structures) <br />' July 2002-Four exploratory trenches (T-1 through T-4)were excavated utilizing a backhoe <br /> and three soil probe borings were advanced at the site, the trenches were excavated at <br /> locations identified during the magnetic survey as possible USTs or buried structures <br />' Trenches T-1, T-2 and T-4 contained assorted waste material, soil samples from the soil <br /> borings did not contain detectible concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons at the depths <br /> sampled Petroleum hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds were detected in a grab <br /> ground water sample at concentrations of 270 micrograms per liter (µg/1) TPH-g, 2 6 µg/l <br /> ------------------------ <br /> toluene, 2 3 µg/i ethylbenzene, 27 6 µg/1 total xylenes, 3 7 µg/1 napthalene, 1 1 µg/1 n- <br /> propylbenzene, 14µg/1 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene,4 1 µg/11,3,5-trimethylbenzene and 12µg/1 <br />' n-butylbenzene, however, the detected concentrations of VOCs do not exceed the state of <br /> California Department of Health ServictsLfD 13 HS) Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) <br /> and Action Levels (Als) Analyticalult of soil and grab ground water samples are <br /> presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively —�jqq �,, rjjL , } M4 ATIr"I <br /> • November 2002 - Two USTs (UST-1 and UST-2) were discovered during excavation of <br />' debris and hydrocarbon-impacted soil The two USTs were single-walled and appeared to <br /> be constructed of redwood with steel banding, the tanks were contained in separate brick <br /> vaults with concrete floors Each tank had an approximate capacity of 15,000 to 20,000 <br /> lie gallons Upon discovery of the tanks, the San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department (EHD) was notified and the tanks were removed under permit Based on <br /> analytical results of soil samples collected from beneath the tanks, it appears that the tanks <br />' contained diesel TPH-d was detected in each of the soil samples collected from beneath <br /> UST-1 and UST-2 and in the stockpile soil sample at concentrations ranging from 1,400 <br />' mg/kg (UST-2) to 28,000 mg/kg (UST-1) None of the other target analytes were detected <br /> in the samples collected <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br />