ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009182 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' 21 January 2004 AGE-NC Project No 04-1129 ' Page 4 of 5 ' 42 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES ' A total of two soil samples were analyzed as described in Section 3 3 Analytes of concern were not detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in the two soil samples ' Analytical results of soil samples are summarized on Table 1 The laboratory reports (CTEL Laboratory Ids 0305-062-1 and 0305-062-2), quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC)report and chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix D 4 3 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION ' Depth to ground water was measured at between 33 48 feet and 34 37 feet bsg in wells MW-1 through MW-3 Relative ground water elevations at the site ranged from 32 85 feet below MSL in ' well MW-2 to 34 37 feet below MSL in well MW-3 (Table 2) Ground water flow direction was inferred to be toward the southeast at a gradient of approximately 0 01 ft/ft Figure 3 depicts the . contours for February 2003 1 ' 4 4 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES None of the target analytes were detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in the samples Icollected from the three ground water monitoring wells Analytical results for the ground water samples for the May 2003 monitoring event are summarized ' on Table 3 The laboratory report(CTLE Laboratory IDs 0305-061-1 through 0305-061-3), QA/QC and chain-of-custody are included in Appendix E 5.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings from this investigation, AGE concludes Analytes of concern were not detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in soil samples Icollected from probe boring PB-20 • On 12 May 2003, the groundwater at the site was inferred to be flowing generally toward the southeast at an average gradient of 0 01 feet/feet • Target analytes were not detected in the giound water samples collected from the three monitoring wells on 12 May 2403 Advanced GeoEnviroomentaf,Iuc