My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009184
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
2450
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544695
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009184
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2019 2:38:01 PM
Creation date
7/24/2019 2:36:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009184
RECORD_ID
PR0544695
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0014243
FACILITY_NAME
UNDEVELOPED PARCEL
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16707028
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2450 S EL DORADO
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I21 January 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 04-1129 <br /> IPage 2 of 3 <br /> 3 12 Collection and Analysis of Ground Water Samples <br /> After allowing the wells to achieve a minimum 80% recovery of the pre-purge volume, water <br /> samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1,MW-2,and MW-3 using the Watera internal <br /> I pump The samples were transferred into laboratory-supplied 40-m1 EPA-approved volatile organic <br /> analysis(VOA)vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative and into one <br /> I-liter amber bottle without a sample preservative The sample containers were then labeled with <br /> well designation,date,time of sampling and the sampler's initials The samples were transported in <br /> a chilled container under chain-of-custody to CTEL, a California Department of Health Services <br /> (DHS)-certified laboratory, for analysis The samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) and as diesel (TPH-d in <br /> I accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified, and <br /> • Benzene,toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes(BTEX)and methyl tertiary-butyl ether in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8021B <br /> 4.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction, and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> I07 October 2003 <br />' 4 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Depth to ground water was measured at between 35 62 feet and 36 68 feet bsg in wells MW-1 <br />' through MW-3 Relative ground water elevations at the site ranged from 34 99 feet below MSL in <br /> well MW-2 to 36 64 feet below MSL in well MW-3 (Table 1) Ground water flow direction was <br /> inferred to be toward the southeast at a gradient of approximately 0 01 ft/ft Figure 3 depicts the <br />' contours for October 2003 <br />' 4 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> I None of the target analytes were detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in the samples <br /> collected from the three ground water monitoring wells <br />' Analytical results for the ground water samples for the October 2003 monitoring event are <br /> summarized on Table 2 The laboratory report (CTLE Laboratory IDs 0310-055-1 through <br /> . 0310-055-3), QA/QC and chain-of-custody are included in Appendix C <br /> IAdvanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.