Laserfiche WebLink
SY;R <br /> eport on Additional Excavation and Cb Armation Soil Sampling <br /> Bulk Transportation Facility, Stockton, California <br /> +� Hygienetics Environmental Services,Inc. <br /> suggested the diesel fuel in the soil was weathered. PIate 2 shows the locations at which soil <br /> samples were collected and the concentration of TPHd found in each sample. Table 1 presents <br /> �.. the results of laboratory analyses for TPHd and BTEX. <br /> Hygienetics also collected samples from three stockpiles of the backfill materials excavated <br /> during UST removal and submitted these samples to the laboratory for analysis for TPHd and <br /> BTEX. The results of these analyses are also presented in Table 1. <br /> �— The results of laboratory analyses of soil samples collected after removal of the UST, pipelines, <br /> and dispenser facilities showed diesel petroleum hydrocarbons were present at relatively high <br /> concentrations in the shallow soil (clay and silt) along a 20-foot-long portion of the diesel-fuel <br /> pipeline trench. Field observations made during excavation and removal work suggested the area <br /> of petroleum-hydrocarbon impact was local in this area of the pipeline trench. Diesel petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons were not present at concentrations of concern elsewhere in the excavations. <br /> V <br /> 2.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY WORK <br /> 2.1 Work Plan <br /> Field observations during the UST and pipeline removal in October 2002 suggested the extent of <br /> diesel fuel in the subsurface soil was restricted to an area beneath the pipeline trench where the <br /> elevated concentrations of TPHd were detected. In a work plan, dated April 17, 2003, <br /> Hygienetics (2003) proposed to excavate and remove diesel-impacted soil from the pipeline <br /> trench; the proposed excavation would be approximately 7 feet wide by 20 feet Ion <br /> maximum of 15 feet deep. The volume of soil to be removed was estimated to be 75 in-place <br /> cubic yards (100 uncompacted cubic yards). Hygienetics proposed to collect six samples o the <br /> native soil at staggered locations along the two sidewalls and on the bottom of the excavation. <br /> The work plan was submitted to the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> (Environmental Health Department) for review. The Environmental Health Department <br /> .. conditionally approved the work plan in a letter to Bulk Transportation, dated May 30, 2003. <br /> Appendix A contains a copy of this approval letter. <br /> 2.2 Excavation <br /> Bulk Transportation identified and marked the locations of underground electrical and water lines <br /> present in the area before excavation began. On July 29, 2003, Foss cut and removed overlying <br /> concrete and excavated diesel-impacted soil using a Case 580 Extend-A-Hoe. Hygienetics observed <br /> much of the excavation and removal work performed on July 29. Diesel-hydrocarbon-impacted soil <br /> was observed to be discolored blue-gray in contrast to the yellow-brown color of the native silt. <br /> Excavation focused on removing visibly discolored soil and minimizing removal of soil that was not <br /> discolored. Hygienetics also used a portable photoionization detector,calibrated to detect diesel-fuel, <br /> to check soil that was not discolored for the presence of diesel vapors. <br /> During excavation, blue-gray discolored soil was encountered to a depth of approximately 12 feet <br /> below grade in the area of the central control dispenser island. Discolored soil was also observed <br /> �. to extend eastward approximately 3 feet beyond the former eastern end of this island and from 6 <br /> to 7 feet south of this island directly beneath the pipeline trench to the former southern satellite <br /> dispenser. In this latter case,most of the discolored soil was found between the depths of 4 and 9 <br /> 3 <br />